was invigorating but we'd no idea it was quite as intoxicating asthat. north shore news| 1139 Lonsdale Ave , North Vancouver, B.C V7M 2H4 (604) 985-2131 \ 2 “CLASSIFIED CIRCULATION 965-2131 080-0511 986-6222 ~ 986-1337 “ Publisher Peter Speck Associate Publisher Editor-in-Chief Advertising Director Eric Cardwell ADVERTISING General Manager ietr flick Stonehouse Faye McCrae Photography Ellaworth Dickaon ~ ¢, Circulation Director . Tim Francis Managing Editor . Accounting Supervisor yao oo —Barbere Keen————- -— Blan A. Elle. North Shore News; founded in 1969 as an independent communi- newepaper and qualified under Schedute tH, Part itl, Paragraph tl of © Excise Tax Act, ie published each Wednesday and Notth Shore free Presa Lid, and distributed to every North Shore. Second Class Mail Registration Number 3685 $20 per yaar. Entire contente © 1984 North Shore Free righta reserved, " No responsibility’ accepted for unsolicited material, including manuscripta and pictures, which should be accompanied by a stamped, addressed return envelope. VERIFIED CIRCULATION: 60,870 Wednesday; 49,913 Sunday Soy SN THIS PAPER IG RECYCLABLE ae a a wot eg Ore a ee ae er re er ee ee alr ere ee ee ee an honest living. That's the knee-jerk reac the 90 per cent of our. citizenry: who'll never have to worry about welfare for themselves. Applied to one category of welfare recipient, it’s not merely a - harsh judgement, It’s a stupid one. The category is single rents for $450; the money parents, of whom there are about 12,000 on welfare in Greater Vancouver -- mostly mothers. How they got into that situation is beside the point. For better or worse our society long ago decided that nobody must be left without food, shelter and life’s bare necessities, So until we're -prepared to actually et people starve to death, the problem remains socicty’s. And B.C.'s present welfare system is proving woefully inefficient at solving it for the benefit of all concerned. The nub of the problem is how to encourage * im- poverished single parents to work themselves off welfare needs can. easily be reduced - to about $90. as, Last November the B.C, Health Ministry : estimated the cost of adequately feeding an adult female and one child at $162 a month, which says it all. Obviously, the only an- swer is to increase welfare payments or allow the recipient to supplement the resent payments to a living ncome level with whatever earnings he or she can obtain by part-time work. However, such carnings aré now limited to $100 per month, bringing the total “legal” income to $640 - ~which, according to the and become self-supporting, government's = own as many of them wanttobe, atatisticfans,. léaves Mom ~~~ nrost- cases the-current—--end-her-child-with-just-over system has exactly the $6 8 week for heat, light, opposite effect, It works to clothing, bus fares, toilet keep reciplents on welfare tissue and similar sundries, indefinitely. Here's how. If you exceed the $100 limit . by a couple of bucks, and report it, your welfare is cut. If you don’t report it and are caught, it can mean three months in jail - the sentence given to Burnaby mother lorence Kemp recently, Nevertheless; hundreds of > other welfare mothers take the same risk: rather than face near-starvation for “990 LEFT OVER The single welfare parent presently receives $540 per month -- in theory $300 for shelter and $240 for food and other basics, -Since the average two-bedroom suite in the Lower Mainland now t hee soak rore left for food and all other . right. se ae or a re Pr er hd citizen. | _ Canadian funds in the aN a themselves: and their children. The Welfare Department may call it fraud, They call {t survival. They babysit, work as homemakers or grab ani other lowly job. for whle “they-can” be patd’ tn “non= ~~ recorded dollar bills, “JUMPING OFF" Unfortunately, these are _ also =the worst-paid . _ sround, A $4-an-hour job, jobs even full time, grosses only about $690 a month, which Is hardly ‘a major inducement to give up. the welfare cheque. To make any. ‘real headway you need a job that : pays by. cheque, with statutory deductions ~ and “ almost automatically. b: automs y hts earning limit to take account :: ‘of ‘the Lower Mainiand’s: , Present exorbitant rents ~ , im ortant, alike reclably:-more. than nadequate .welfare cheque them into conflict wit $100-a-month rule, Quite clearly, the solutio is to raise: the allowab! saibly to a ceiling of $250 ever ‘tnd above" the $540. welfare cheque itself. . It would cost the taxpayer little extra, if anything at all, : because so many welfare . recipients -are already. | surropatittously exceeding ". the $100 fimit anyway. But It. would free them from the’ threat of a possible jail term: and a criminal record which practically: guarantees that they --remain...on . wollare: It would be a giant step. forward in encouraging independence and,’ most» an eventual. reduction in.the numbert — now dependent on long-term welfare, With present-day inflation”, the existing welfare.” regulation . againat. reasonable self-help morely in. order to survive is bilking recipients and. taxpayers ope hppa “Ina word, it's plain dumb. ©