ae 8 SETLIST RY By IM McDOWELL Speaking in English and French to a Vancouver conference of the Canadian Association of Statutory Human. Supreme Court Justice Tom Berger called for province- wide unified family courts, . family advocates, and lay panels to’ ensure legal protection of. family and child rights, - Vriegphoto), “The law offers virtually _ no protection to the family as.a social institution,” said | Berger. “The family is less protected than corporations or trade unions.” The law recognizes the ‘need to maintain and protect the family as a matter of public policy, but it only defines a series of general legal relationships between family members. Seeing this problem several years ago, child welfare advocates demanded a B.C. Royal Commission on Family and Children’s Law, which Berger headed, to _ Study law reforms in this area. To understand the rights of families and a joy. art in the world. information. Rights | Agencies, — JUSTICE THOMAS: BERGER, of the Family and Children’s Law Commission. (Hendrik de ‘nw - - . fs iG —- - . . children, the commission looked at human rights, state intervention, and due process. ; The commission ended its year-and-a-half study in 1975 after making 12 reports recommendin many changes. ; “The most important developmert _in_ the evolution of. family law,” said Berger, “has been the emerging emphasis on the - ‘rights of children.” Under 18th century common law children were considered chattel property. Only in the last 100 years has the family become centered around the -welfare of the child, leading to school systems for mass education, .a prolonged childhood, and the strains of adolescence. Now state intervention to protect the needs of children ‘is widely ' accepted, « but children still:have no clearly defined rights under the law. Yet, says Berger, “The most profound questions of human rights arise within the family.” For example: does an adopted child have the right to know his natural Sotheby Parke Bernet Owning a home filled with a lifetime of valued possessions is However, in the event of an unexpected change—a loss from fire or theft, a divorce, or an estate probate—knowing the true value of your things becomes a must. The Sotheby Parke Bernet Appraisal Service can really help. Since 1744, we've been telling people the value of their paintings, furniture, jewelry and other household collectibles. We're the largest and oldest appraisers and auctioneers of fine Our appraisals are also used for insurance, tax planning, and sale purposes. Mr. Rupert Fennell, head of our Appraisal Service in the West will be at our Vancouver offices the week of June 18. Call Mr. Uno Langmann at (604) 736-3212 for more Shouldn't you have your fine things appraised now? It could be one of your most priceless investments. 2117 Granville St., Vancouver parents? When can the state - intervene to remove a child from the parents? “These are guestions of first im- portance,” claimed Berger, “when you consider 80,000 children in Canada needed ‘protection in 1977.” Then there are questions of due process. Must there be a fair hearing before an impartial tribunal with both sides represented by lawyers? Should a child have a lawyer of his own, or does the law assume his interests are the same as those of his parents? Should the child have the right to speak for himself? At what age? ‘But the big question is how. to enforce these rights. The Commission decided’ “the family is entitled: . to recognition and protection under the law,” said Berger. And he saw promise in the unified family courts now being called for Canada. Two of these courts have been tried out in Richmond and Surrey since 1974. This scheme placed family court judges under the same roof with other judges for better ~ coordination of resources and services. A_ staff of counsellers was also at- tached to the Family Courts to try and work out disputes or provide follow-up. “As far as the rights of children are concerned,” noted Berger, “one of the most important legal in- novations in the B.C. pilot project is the establishment of the office of family ad- vocate.” These are lawyers ap- pointed by, but independent from, the Attorney General. Their job is to represent the interests of children in any case where it is necessary. Berger noted, “This is an office unique in Canada.” LAY PANELS : Another new aspect of the B.C. pilot project is lay panels made up of two community people who sit with each judge in cases involving the protection of children. Lay panels were pioneered in Scotland and Sweden. Legislation has been passed to permit them (604) 736-3212 across _ f children’s r in’ B.C. so better decisions can be made on standards of child care. These panels do- not decide issues of law or evidence. Berger said the family court judge and the family whose case he is hearing. often have different views.on child rearing. The lay panel can bridge this gap. For example, Berger noted, “40% of the children taken away from their families in B.C. are native Indians. We've said two native people should sit with the judge in such cases and the majority decides what’s best for the child.”- | “A beginning has been made with these lay panels,” said Berger. “The panels consisted of-a cross section of the community, and all — the judges were enthusiastic about their usefulness. If lay panels work out, I feel they should be used in juvenile Lid Cases. : The commission’s recommendations have been studied for three years by the Law Reform Commission of CANADIAN WHISKY CANADIEN Thomas Adams Distillers ft. YORONTO OWT Canada, which will soon make a report. Berger wouldn’t predict what their finding would be, nor would he comment on which reforms should get priority from the government. But he did say: “Lay panels are an idea I pushed. Id like to see it put _ to work in B-C7 Legislation is ‘already in place to permit them. Pressure has to come from the community.” PARENTS SUED On children’s rights Berger said: “We decided a child as a human being is entiteld to human rights. If a child is handicapped, his. handicap should not diminish his rights.” He said the passage of a bill by the U.S. Congress specifying the rights. of handicapped children was “not a sound way to ap- proach the problem. I think it’s better to lay out the rights of all children.” The U.S. has no federal bill of rights for all children, but it does have a strong one for ee Sy VANCOUVER BOC. comprehensive’ money to work with. _ Page 71, Jane 13, 1979 - North Shore News @ eet i: aan \ a i | . | . : handicapped youth that has been controversial. “I urge you to remember,” warned Berger, “the notion of children’s rights can easily be misunderstood. It does not mean a child can call his lawyer when you tell him he can’t go out to play after dark.” . In the U.S. some children, . now grown up, are suing their parents for neglect. Berger says, “I can’t chink of anything more destructive to the family, or more of @ mockery to a serious sub- ject.” He wants a general standard for support, ser- ‘vices, and due process that is “centered on strengthening the family.” = — : “We are entering a new era,” said Berger, “when the idea is becoming widespread. that. children have rights under the law. But he warned people not to expect too much of the law, reminding them it ‘can only go so far-and. government Officials only have so much CANADA at 79