Where does our water come from? Greater Vancouver's water cornes from rain and snowmelt that is stored in three mountain reservoirs — Capilano, ; Seymour and Coquitlam. The Coquitlam reservoir is the Jargest source, but the GVRD shares this water with BC Hydro and must pay BC Hydro for some of the water. is there enough water? Yes and no. While it rains a fot here, the three mountain reservoirs are only large enough to store a sufficient supply of water for another 10 years. By the year 2005, we will need to expand storage by building a new, higher Seymour Falls Damn or by negotiating with BC Hydro for . fights to more Coquitlam reservoir water. Aggressive water conservation meas- ures could help to delay this by several years, however this choice is also related to water quality and earthquake upgrading. Why are we concerned about future water supply when itr rains so much here? ° Most rain falls during the fall, winter and spring when demand for water is low. -.. Because the GVRD has limited storage. capacity, much of the water that falls in ... this fow-demand period cannot be . stored: In the: summer, high demand strains.our, limited storage. reserves. The Lower ‘Mainland’ Ss first water. main s built in 1889 Since the Seymour Fails Dam does not meet modern earthquake Standards what can be done to make it safer? The existing dam can be upgraded to modern earthquake standards or a new, higher, seismically sound dam can be constructed. Construction of a new dam would address two concerns: it would ensure seismic stability and would provide more storage. Construction of a new dam will cost $90 million, while seismic upgrading of the present dam will cost approximately $18 million, is the water safe to drink? There have been no confirmed health problems related to the quality of this region's drinking water. However, the - water does not consistently meet gov- ernment standards and the risk of - waterborne disease will persist if steps are not taken to ensure that the water is safequarded. How is the water treated now? The water is run through a coarse screening system and is chlorinated at all three sources (primary disinfection) as it enters the regional distribution system. Water Quality Problems & Solutions Waterborne | Cysts ate olten detected Disease in the water system at (Giardiasis low levels potential) Bacterial feveis are too high; occurence exceeds standards; disinfectant depletes along system Colifo7m Bacteria Turbidity Often too high, “ iness especially at Capilano & (Cloud ) Seymour. High turbidity Solution Kill the cysts with a simary disinfectant at low turbidity and remove them with fillration at higher turbidity Provide secondary disinfectant — either chlorine or chloramine throughout the system Draw from cleaner source and {iter turbid source GVRD Option eUse Chlorine disinfectant «Filter Seymour «Fitter Capilano *Rechlorinate or Chioraminate *Shut down the source and use Westerly - Transfer as an interim . interferes with disinfection Natural acidity causes corrosion of metal pipes and faucets Corrosive Water Wilf the GVRD add a disinfectant in addition to the chlorine that is already added at source (near the reservoirs)? Yes. Secondary disinfection (the addition of chlorine or chloramine) is needed to safeguard drinking water in the distribu- tion system. A primary disinfectant such as chlorine will sti! be added at source. How will the water taste after a secondary disinfectant is added?. lf rechlorination is selected, most areas. will have a higher potential for chlorinous tasting water, especially near rechlorination stations. Chloramination will have a less chiorinous taste. Do chiorine and chloramine cause cancer? There is no evidence that.chlorine or chloramine alone are carcinogenic at. concentrations typically used in drinking water systems. The combination of chlorine ana ;satural organics in the water (such as decaying vegetation) do - combine to form compounds known as #s|. disinfection by-products, which have Greater Vancouver's Water System serves more than 1.6 million people been linked, using very high doses, to cancer in laboratory animals. Acceptable limits for these by-products are set out in the Canadian Drinking Water Guidelines. Chloramine produces significantly lower levels of disinfection by-products than chlorine dees. Raise the pH of the water solution only Filter Seymour *Filter Capilano eAdd minerals to reduce corrosion (carbonate) Why not eliminate all chlorine to avoid the cancer risk? Health Canada and other health agen- cies throughout the world maintain that the risk of waterborne disease resulting: frorn untreated water is of much greater: _ concern than the very smail risk of cancer associated with chlorination. « Which secondary disinfectant option do health officials preter? ° The following is an excerpt froma letter. sent to the GVRD from the metropolitan Medical Health Officers: : “Since chloramination appears to give : the best tasting water, will adequately provide good disinfection, wiil meet the (guidelines for disinfection by- products). and will delay or reduce the need for’. filtration, the Medical Health Officers’ - unanimously support chioramination as ° the future secondary disinfection proc- ess for the GVRD”. e . Are there environmental impacts associated with chloramine and ; rechlorination? : Both chloramine. and chiorine can kill .. fish if treated water is released into a:: fish-bearing stream. Both are toxic to: fish because they damage ‘the gills of fish, preventing the ‘transfer of oxygen. from the water to he bicod stream. Chlorine diss ipat: os more quickly: and i is unlikely to kill as many fish as , chloramine. ; aos! Chiorine & Chloramine Comparison. Issues Drinking Water (Health) Guidelines by-products Environmental Risk Aesthetic Taste‘Odor Costs: Capital. Annual Operation & Maintenance Filtration $40 - $50 million $3 - $5 million Coquitlam Environmental Up to $55 million Response Implementation The Waier Distribution System covers a land _area of more than 2;000 sq. km. Rechlorination Fair to Good, Filtration may be required to control disinfection Low to severe depending on conditions - Dept. of Fisheries - prosecution potential is low $360 millisn more for filtering Chioramination. Good. Filtration not required tn: : control disinfection by-products 1 to 20 times more than - : rechiorination. Dept. of Fisheries”. prosecution potential is high as some | . fish kills will undoubtedly occur. Chiorinous taste Almost no {laste $1 - $2 million $500,060 “$600. isiele) of Filtering Coquitlam not required Up to $70 million & - 10 years. 50 - 60 rechiorination| 3 years. 3 chloramination stations Stations throughout region at sources The three: - watersheds cover an area of | 585 square | kilometres