AN ENVIRONICS Research Group poll shows that fully 20 per cent of Canadians now place environmental concerns at the top of their list of urgent problems to be dealt with. Unemployment — the classic bugaboo of the citizenry — scores a mere 12 per cent, and everything else falls well below, such issues as free trade having dropped off the bottom of the scale of public opi- nion entirely, the loss of some 75,000 jobs to the U.S. in the last year notwithstanding. What is significant about these poll results is that they apparently represent a permanent turning- point. Until October 1988, despite two full decades of passionate ac- tivism on the part of conserva- tionists, public concern about the environment had remained cons- tant at a piddling three per cent. With environment now firmly at the top of the list of public con- cerns, enormous political and social pressure comes to bear on the ecological question, hitherto the domain of either the counter- culture (remember that?) or a handful of artists, academics and veggies. Politicians in a democracy, even an imperfect democracy such as ours, simply cannot resist pressure like this. The last federal election saw a lot of lip-service paid to the environment — the new polls had just come in — but before the elec- tion had run its course the issue got buried in the free trade debate. The next federal election, like every provincia! and municipal election in between, will pit fire- breathing green politicians against other fire-breathing green politi- cians, simply because all parties, from the Socreds to the Parti E+i Employment and Immigration Canada Quebecois, are scrambling to green themselves. What caused the change? Why, between March and October two years ago, did public opinion massively shift from ecological apathy to something approaching panic? The short answer is that the summer of 1988 saw the first really tangible evidence of the Greenhous: Effect. Or, perhaps more to the point, the media for the first time really concentrated on the blistering heat wave that nearly wiped out North America’s food surplus, the emergence of super-hurricanes, and the first documented evidence of global warming. But at a deeper level, the im- plications of the Gorbachev Revo- lution finally registered in the West. We were not, it became clear, going to nuke ourselves to death en masse. It takes two superpowers to wipe Gut a planet. The moment one of them drops out of the Dance of Shiva, the megadeath party is over. From the moment the majority of us began to realize that a nu- clear winter wasn't in the cards, but a greenhouse summer definite- ly was, and thal it was potentially every bit as disastrous in the long tun, the focus of our fear shifted from Star Wars to Mother Earth. As we head into the '90s, we will be confronted by plenty to keep our fear alive. Dr. David Suzuki says our Emploi et planet is ‘‘dying,"' and that if we do not turn the tide of events around between now and the end of the century, we will be over- whelmed by an irreversible en- vironmental cataclysm. Hard on the heels of the Nestuc- ca and Exxon Valdez oil spills, as the decade begins, comes the 70,000-ton Kharg 5 spill off Morocco and the 25,000-ton Aragon spill off the Canary Islands. Eopect another major nuclear accident on the scale of Three-Mile Island or Chernobyl some time in the decade...”’ Both these disasters have been attributed to the fact that the world tanker fleet is aging. Most supertankers were built in the 1970s, and, like old-model cars and jumbo jets, are getting close to the end of their life expectancy, which means that on top of all the natural reasons for accidents at sea, including drunken skippers and faulty radar, we have the problem of long-in-the-tooth tankers. Expect more oil spill catastro- phes than ever! Also, keep in mind that it is not just tanker fleets that are aging. So are nuclear reactors all over the world, including Canada’s cluster of them, mainly in Ontario. Even though the nuclear in- dustry insists that the CANDU Immigration Canada reactor is good for 40 years, a unit at Pickering nearly hada meltdown a couple of years ago. Ontario came close to province- wide power shortages this sinter due to prolonged repair work on several reactors that shouldn’t, in theory, have been down. Expect another major nuclear accident on the scale of Three-Mile Island or Chernobyl some time in the decade, more likely sooner than later! The ravages of the Greenhouse Effect will also be felt within a couple of years as massive drought leads to famine on a scale never seen before. Respected French agronomist Rene Durnont told a conference on global warming in Montreal jast month that a million people in the Third World died last summer as a direct result of the rise in planetary temperature and resulting drought and desertification — and this is just the beginning! images of children dying not just in Ethiopia, but throughout all of Africa and much of the Asian subcontinent, and not because of political bungling by their leaders, but because of carbon dioxide spouted from the exhausts of cars in places like Vancouver and Toronto, are going to be with us virtually every day of the decade. Twenty per cent worried about the environment? It seems high now, but within a couple of years it will have gone up in direct pro- portion to the global disaster un- folding around, over, and under us. The long-awaiting greening is long overdue, but it’s cominge i Ben Chow Retail Sales Manager inda Stewart, Advertising Director, is pleased to an- nounce the appointment of Benjamin C. Chow to the posi- tion of Retail Sales Manager of the North Shore News. Ben comes to the NEWS from the Prince George Citizen, a Southam owned daily newspaper, where he served as Account Executive for seven years. Prior to that, Ben was a realtor with Royal LePage. Ben brings extensive ex- perience and knowledge in ac- count management, advertising planning and sales promotion to the News Display Advertising Department. As Retail Sales Manager, Ben will oversee nine Retail Advertising Consuitants. Teed VORCE 08 SONTS AMO WEST MARC OUTER The Government of Canada zecently presented to Parliament a series of amendments to the Unemployment Insurance Act (UIA). The purpose of the proposed amendments ts to improve existing legislation and to provide additional funds for programs and job training in areas critical to Canada’s economic future. Major improvements include additional maternity/parental benefits and the extension of coverage to people who choose to work beyond age 65. Although passed by the House of Commons on November 6th, 1989, Bill C-21 is still under consideration y the Senate and will not become law on December 31. Under one section of the current law, workers may qualify for regular UI benefits with at least 10 to 14 weeks of work during the previous year. That section of the law expires January 6th, 1990 and until amend- ments to the Act are adopted the following interim rule applies: Anyone making a claim for regular UI benefits that would have started on or after January 7, 1990, must have worked a minimum of 14 weeks during the last year to qualify. For more information contact your local Canada Employment Centre (CEC). There are more than 500 CECs across Canada; phone numbers are listed in the Federal Government section of your phone book. Canada