1139 Avenue North Vancouver, B.C. V7MA 2H4 PETER SPECK es Publisher 995-213 Doug Foot Comotsotier 985-2131 (133) Chris Johnsen Operations Manager Timothy Resekew Managing Editor 865-2131 (115). Barbers Ean Distribution Mang : 988-1337 (ta > ee . Blapiny & Maal Estzto Fax Sneercem Fax Acorenting & Mate Oifioe Fax orth Shere Mews, founded in 1969 as an independent suburban newspaper and qualified wider Schedule 111, Paragraph 111 of the 985-2131 (166) "S fenattean Sell Production $68-2131 {1 Sales Product Agreement No. 0087238. Mailing rates available on request. Entire contents © 1996 North Shore ‘Free Press Ltd. . ti Saree rights reserved. eee Pac Psi Eno? artic et fy lad news viewpoint PEER RE EN RELL MELE) OLA IT LOIEL IS IME TS TERI LNT STEN TR TONER MEG ESE ATMA TERE SENT SES BEFORE WE ACCEPT You UNDER BANISH COLUMBIAS IMMIGRANT INVESTOR FUND, FM GOING TO ASK YOU SOME TOUGH AND IMPORTANT QUESTIONS... VLE CASH OF CHEQUE ? (eat NEN EPR PI RAO nt apa a maNteeELAD Sottero BAY DntnaAilA nthe rp ainemel acne Strange dealings % EALINGS ON the school board front in North Vancouver are flabbergasting Jr to say the least. Close observers of the building friction between the provincial government and the North Vancouver school board saw the writ- ing on the wall as far as the abbreviated term _ of office served by the trustees. Given the mounting deficit, $4.9 million by the end of ‘this fiscal year, and the board’s inability to deal with it, the firing was inevitable. The province chose. not .to take up the board’s longstanding request to look at its books. Both sides became entrenched and triggered the crisis, fo Some big questions to ponder in the wake of this minor catastrophe: Why did the gov- ernment. choose to play tough and plunk down the scorched earth card? Was considei- ation given to having Bob Smith, the govern- ment-appointed official trustee of the school district, come in to deal with the fiscal side of ' the job while keeping the trustees in place to address the balance of their responsibilities? | Will Smith as an appointed civil servant sim- ply play a rubber-stamping role as a puppet of the NDP Ministry of Educatica? What are we to make of the bizarre request by Smith that the trustees continue to serve on commit- tees related to the duties of the position that has been taken from them? And finally, what of the fundamental ques- tion of democracy in this situation?. The trustees were elected by North Vancouver res- idents. Another level of elected representa- tives has abused this process, Should the elec- torate have been sufficiently. disenchanted with the performance of the school trustees, ° they could have bounced them from office this year. That right has been taken from them. ill 2 a Heel eee Not all on the dole are bums Dear Editor: In his Jan. 14 column ("Socialist Supreme”) Doug Collins writes, “The welfare system has boomed and B.C. became the most attractive place in the country for bums. With top rates.” am on social assistance. 1- have four years of college, two, F in geology and two in electro-: | . mechanical engineering, sever- ]° .. al years of work experience, ' military service with an honor-.. able discharge, and a stron desire to work. a T look for work every. day. and try to survive on the “top rates” that I receive . each: month: $520. After paying rent and a bus pass, I have $116 to., pay for food, clothes, entertain-: ment and the costs.related to. getting a job. There are, thou sands like me on welfare. We seek work but unfortunately. there are more people: than jobs. a True, there. may be “bums' in the system, but to say every one collecting welfare is a bum’. is ludicrous.* If Doug Collins. actual} believes that the, unemployed and poor are “bums,” I begin to’ wonder what his qualifications : are. Is he a sociologist, does he have a degree in: joumalism’ Or perhaps-he used to work fo: one of those weekly news: tabloids? 0. Se If 231 people on welfare are “bums,” is it true. that all jour-:'- nalists and reporters are: clu less and have no credibility to. _ their profession? Of ca d In every: group. of: people there are those-who tend to hurt . their peers by example.:. were'a journalist, I'd be con cerned about people like Dou Collin, 0 fe David Wilson North Vancouver violence, smut hard to tame TODAY’S GALLOPING technology is capable of pro- ducing answers to most prob- lems — if only human beings would stop getting in its way. Take Hollywood's unashamed cult of violence and promiscuity which floods our TV screens. Every night an average of seven out of the roughly 350 characters who appear on them in prime time are Wright it’s now on hold until April follow- ing protests and threats of trade retaliation from below the border. Meanwhile, however, one of technology’s latest gadgets could make such a step unnecessary. Currently being tested in various Canadian cities, the V-chip “cen- sor" can be installed in cable TV boxes and works in conjunction with a program classification sys- tem. Soetin DP cata teal Fe Peetan Tat al E aint at a murdered, not ic mention those injured, beaten up or threateacd. . Also in prime time a Planned Parenthood survey counted some 65,000 sexual references per year — nearly 200 per night. And a ~ study by the U.S. Centre for Media and Public Affairs found that some 88% of all sexual encounters in TV dramas involved extra-marital rela- tions. More than 60 major university studies show that prolonged expo- sure to such vicious junk encour- ages more hostile. violent and aggressive behavior in real life. In particular, the effect on impression- ble youngsters has Canada’s top broadcast regulator, the Canadian Radio-television and Telecom- eels wee ta Aad bg Ba ete hither ‘1 and yon munications Commission (CRTC), deeply worried. It sees children and teens — in particular, “home alone” kids whose parents are out working — becoming desensitized to the smut and mayhem they absorb for hours daily from the tube. Soaring teenage violence statistics in recent years lend weight to those. con- cems. As a result the CRTC has a plan to black out violent U.S. shows on Canadian cable systems — though ER ate le a a ome That means every program would carry a rating code denoting its violence, sexual content or coarse language — if applicable. Then the V-chip would enable mom or dad to screen out programs whose codes indicated materia! they didn’t want their offspring to watch. It seems a perfect answer. Today 82% of Canadian homes have cabte TV. No public censorship is invoived. The technology is backed by the U.S. government, which may soon require V-chips in all new TV sets. But there’s still one big hurdle to clear: the classiftcation code sys- tem itself — without which the V- chip is useless. Canadian broadcasters and cabl firms are already at work putting together a code. But U.S. broad- casters — ignoring President’. . Clinton's pleas because of apperent fear of some kind of state censor-!': ship — are dragging their heels and. may not go alon? sith Canada’s system. if . That could‘torcs the CRTC to revert to its original, politically’ messy option of blacking out U.S. programs on Canadian cable —- 3}. °: almost certainly leading to negative: ~ Canada-U.S. trade repercussions. ©. With both governments eager, -—_ yet so far seemingly heipless — to" protect young citizens from" | Hollywood's torrent of blood, lust | and filth, one has to wonder whc’s. really in charge on this continent. Washington? Ottawa? Or NBC’. . and Universal Studios? “les eave WISH many happy returns of |" Saturday, Feb. 3, to West.Van 3°. Kiwanis birthday boy Joe Lindsey. WRIGHT OR WRONG: The | trouble. with some folks is that they, don’t have a single redeeming’ : defect. uo