e IN THE end, I think it will be the helicopter issue that will forestall another Tory government, untess Jean Charest becomes prime minister and finds a way to quietly brush Kim Campbell's helicopter madness aside, in the same way that his mentor, Brian Mulroney, shunted a previous defence minister’s crazy vision of a fleet of nuclear sub- marines off the agenda entirely. Between now and the Tory convention, we can assume that “Stormin’ Kim’’ won't change her mind about anything so big as the chopper purchase, if only because she can’t afford to look like an utter ditherer. (Personally, I like a certain amount of dithering. It means somebody’s trying to keep up to date.) In the meantime, it certainly can’t be helping Campbell’s cam- paign to have to keep playing Maggie Thatcher, bronking like a goose to show how tough she is. Sure, it must be a fine line be- tween offering a new, implicitly gender-inspired ‘style’? of lead- ership, and yattering the same old warhorse stuff that we have always heard from the Tories to justify massive expenditures of tax money on what is basically a form of defence socialism. All she is doing with her decidedly out-of-synch Cold Warriorism is carrying on the tradition of the modern industrial state depending on military spend- ing. As John Kenneth Galbraith pointed out back when defence minister Campbell was in high school, ‘military expenditures are what now make the public sector Jarge."’ How can you fight deficits while making the military bigger? Since the 1950s, “the relation of the Cold War to the needs of the industrial system has been ex- tremely close,’’ Galbraith wrote in The New Industrial State, some- thing Campbell should have, must have — read long ago. Like, the Sixties? Other thinkers, like Ralph E. Lapp, a member of the Manhat- tan Project and author of The - Weapons Culture, have been argu- ing since a decade before even - then that free enterprise has been distorted by a system in which the welfare of the country is perma- nently tied to the continued growth of soilitary technology and the stockpiling of military hard- ware. This criticism was aimed mainly at the U.S., of course. Certainly, it applies to a lesser degree in Canada, or in most other indus- trial powers, but the point is, it HUGE SAVINGS « STRICTLY. PERSONAL still applies. The helicopter issue is a perfect example. If we were to take $6 billion and blow it on something other than enormously expensive hunt- er/killer air machines, we could, for instance, quite possibly clean up our filthy harbor.;, from Vie- torid to St. John, where untreated ~ sewage is still being dumped into the oceans. instead, if combative Kim has her way, it will be gunships, not daycare and doctors. Where on carth is her head at? What Cana- dian needs a goddam flying death “machine, when so many of us are in such dire straits? Yet, with her attitude and the peculiar parliamentary system we have (which allows a prime minister many of the prerogatives of a king or queen, and his or her cabinet the powers of a de facto oligarchy),who is to doubt that she won't push her program through? | have to take her at her word, And I have to wonder, surely we don’t need a re-run of the Celtic chieftaness routine that served poor old Britain so poorly in the dying days of the Cold War! The Iron Lady struck heroic postures — still docs — but any- body who thinks the Thatcher Era did the Brits a whole lot of good hasn't been paying attention to what’s going on over there these HUGE SELECTION! OPEN MON. - FRI 10-8 SAT. 10-6 SUN, 12-5 5550 FRASER Van. Sc isn t just the Queen, Charlie, Fergie ard the Prime Minister having a hard time of it. An entire generation has been thrown to the tender mercies of the banks, after having been sold a patently out- of-touch-with-reality (either that or just plain cruel) neo-conser- vative bill of goods. I dwell on the image of the [ron Lady because it seems clear that this is the person who serves as Kim Campbell’s role model. This business of vowing to fight them on the beaches with 50 high-tech superhelicopters worth nearly $6 billion (and rising), ata time when the country has almost three million people on welfare, with another 1.5 million unable to find work, throwing all that wealth to a European consortium (working, granted, with a Quebec partner), does seem a bit weird, especially since most of the chop- pers are stated for anti-submarine work... Against whom? Are we plan- ning to fight the Americans over arctic waters? The Russians aren't exactly coming. And the Serbs don’t have any subs. {t's a bit scary, | must admit, watching Ms. Campbell show her fascist side so quickly. I mean “‘fascist,”’ of course, in the loose sense of the word, in the way that she herself apparently meant ‘‘enemies’’ when she refer- red to all non-deficit-fighters as “enemies of Canada.” With her tough-guy comments about us non-deficit-fighting, non-card-carrying party member slobs being published just a week after the departing Sun King, Mulroney, told the media in Paris he didn’t give a damn what people icopters could sink Jory aspirations thought back home about his boar-shooting escapade outside Moscow, is it altogether surpris- ingly that some of us get the feel- ing that we’re generally being told by our Tory rulers to eat cake? Cake? Hm. More like ... weil, never mind. When You Can’t Believe Everything You Read. Come in and we'll rid you of that blurry feeling. © Douglas Optical Dispensary Ltd. 1685 Marine Drive in West Vancouver : 4 1640 G2 ioe eee Sara 925-2110 PER NIGHT, ANY NIGHT, UNTIL JUNE 30, 1993, RATES SUBJECT TO AVAILABILITY. GROUP RATES AVAILABLE. ADVANCED RESERVATIONS REQUIRED