nerth shore news VIEWPOINT ISEX Sats " EAVE it to the Girl Guides tc eturn some sanity to this new age of hysterical inclusiveness. Too bad the Boy Scouts don’t share the same good sense. The national council of the Boy Scouts of Canada recently veted to become a fully co-ed organization. In other words there will henceforth be girls in what before 1992 was an exclusively male domain. For the past six years, girls have been allowed in Boy Scout troops, but the decision to include them in those troops has been made at a local level. Now it’s a national policy to include one and all. Thus we no longer have the chauvinistic Boy Scouts of Canada, we have instead the neutered Scouts Canada — your human rights industry hard at work on your behalf. But the Girl Guides of Canada have simply said no to similar foolishness. Boys have never been a part of the Girl Guides and never will be. Thank God for that. The organization, which provides invaluable instruction to girls in life skills from female role models, believes in the simple philosophy that the fessons and skills taught in Girl Guides are best learned in a single-sex environ- ment. The Human Rights crybabies be damned. Girls need role models of their own gender to develop into well-adjusted, useful women. Boys need role models of their own gender to develop into well-adjusted, useful men. Organizations that have the courage of their convictions and common sense to maintain those principles in the face of modern unisex society deserve sup- port and applause. cee Se bans cey pa pe CP OReVE Whee é 4 eee mt Weighty News issues Dear Keaders: RW. Pearson of North Vancouver recently wrote us to complain that our Nov. | issue weighed only 4 02., but carried 20 oz. of flyers. “Is this really the voice of North and West Vancouver — junk mail, advertising flyers and minima! news? (The issue] was massive in size, but vou have obviously lost your focus on what your obligation is to your ceader.” The world of publist:ing and advertising has changed a lot over the last few years. It used to be that our advertising reps (and the publisher) could talk to almost any advertiser on the North Shore and have a reasonable expectation of selling advertising. But the complexion of merchandising has changed, and what we have now is a chain-dominated rarket- place, with fewer independent merchants that we can talk to one-on-one. Decisions are made in Toronto, Calgary and Los Angeles. Chain store merchandisers are attracted to flyers. They print them by the millions, and they send them to us by the truck- load. At the North Shore News, we have a love-hate rela- tionship with flyers. We love the revenue and it reduces our dis- tribution costs, Bur flyer pages are not ad pages. Every ad page in the North Shore News pays for about a third of'an editor- ial page. Flyer advertisers don’t participate in North Shore News readership. Many of them feel that using the News’ excellent distribution system is cnough, and that when their flyer comes into your houschald you will read it. That's not the case in about 80% of North Shore house- holds, for the average flyer. In about cight jiouscholds out of 10, the flyers are unopened and unread — discarded and recy- cled. But in 92% of the North Shore’s households and apart- ments, the North Shore News is gone through from cover to cover, every issue. We have invested 30 years and millions of person-hours to earn that readership and respect, and advertis- ers who only buy flyers don’t necessarily get their message in front of our readers. Our in-paper advertisers reach a lot more people than the best-read flyer distributed on the North Shore does. One would think it would be simple to show that to the advertisers. It isn’t. Peter Speck north shore : North Shore Hews, founded in 1969 as an independent suburban newspaper and quattied under Schedule 111, Paragraph 111 of the Excise Tax Act is published each Wednesday, Friday and Sunday by North Shore Free Press, Lad. and distributed to every door on the North Shore Canada Post Canadian Pubeations Mai * Sales Product Agreement No. 0087238 Mading rates available on request. Barbara Ema Distribution Manager 986-1337 (124) Nisga’a OK THERE’S nothing too wrong with the Nisga’a Treaty, if seen as a single isolated deal. There’s a lot terribly wrong with it as a “model” for all future treaty-mak- ing. To summarize: the Nisga’a people get 2,000 sq. km. of land in a remote area of northwest B.C. where only 100 or so non-natives live. The band also gets $312 mil- lion over 15 years. The resident Nisga’a popula- tion of some 2,500 will have a form of self-government exercising more powers than a municipaliry, with non-native residents denied any vote in electing it and ineligible to stands for office. Still, no big sweat maybe, jus this once. After waiting more than a Century, the Nisga’a have shown great patience and dignity at the negotiating table. It’s a relatively uny, faraway corner of the province. In practice, the chances of any non-native being seriously inconve- nienced seem almost nil. So why nor let the Nisga’a have their settlement and enjoy it? But when it comes to the other 50- odd claims still to be negotiated — including Greater Vancouver and heavily developed areas like Prince George, Kamloops and the Okanagan, where two- thirds of British Columbians live and work, the Nisga’a Treaty as a “model” becomes much more ominous. PETER SPECK Pubiisher $85-2131 (101) Jonathan Beil Creative Services Manager 98S-2131 (127) 61,582 (average curculation, Wednesday, Friday & Sunday) Stephenson Classified Manager Photography Manager 988-6222 (202) 985-2131 (160) Comptroller 985-2131 (133) Entire contents © 1997 North Shore Free Press Ltd, Ail rights reserved. The so-called principles guiding the BC Treaty Commission include a masi- mum land giveaway not exceeding 5% of the province's total land area — which works out at 46,487 sq.km. Deduct the Nisga‘as’ 2,000 sg.km. and we're left with an average land transter to cach of the other 50 aboriginal claimants of $90 sq. kim. But since another Treaty Commission principle says “private land is not on the table,” the land portion of settlements in built-up urban areas would clearly be mini- mal. So how is that going to play in our own neck of the woods? Presumably our Squamish and Burrard band neighbors would be quick to grab such morsels of public land as Ambleside Park (which they already half own), Waterfront Park and Cates Park. Over town, Stanley Park, Hastings Park and Jericho. All ripe for profitable real estate development by our native fellow-citizens — why not 1,000 acres of highrises covering a deforested Stanley Park? King-size subdivisions cov- ering Ambleside and Cates Parks? A native-run shopping mall with “big box” stores on the PNE grounds? However, this still falls far short of the average 890 sq. km.land “entitlement” for each remaining claim. So cash in lieu — likely masses of it — will be demand- ed. And don’t fall for the ploy that B.C. pays only one-fifth, while the feds pay the rest. Does nobody in B.C. pay Ortawa income tax? hither and yon LETTERS TO THE EDITOR Letters must include your name, full address & telephone number. VIA e-mail: trenshaw @ direct.ca Managing Editor 985-2131 (116) Thixt Agrios: Promotions Manager 985-2131 (218) Aron Evers 980-0511 (307) Gail Saelgrave Acting Display Manager General Otfice Manager 985-2131 (105) internet http:/Aeww.nsnews.com Nie — but not the process Meanwhile, what about native self government in urban areas populated almost entirely by non-natives? Taking the Nisya’a deal, are we, for example, talking about replacing the three North Shore councils with Squamish and Burrard band councils elected solely by aboriginals, with the other 98% of the population disenfranchised? If not, what kind of self-government ARE we talking about? These questions, as crazy as some may sound, have not ver been answered, They obviously must be, if the Nisga’a Treaty ts indeed seen as a “model” for future set- tlements. Exactly which parts of it are to be copied in future treaties? And what will be substituted tor those parts that cannot be copied? [n short, both native and non-native B.C. citizens are entitled to 2 much more precise list of the princi- ples enshrined in the treaty for future use, BEFORE it is graven in stone for all time. Today’s treaty opponents are not bashing the Nisga’a. They are challenging the faceless Treaty Commission bureau- crats and their NDP masters who would deny us our most basic democratic right — the right to know, and approve in advance by referendum, the road they're leading us down. oa0a MANY HAPPY RETURNS of romor- row, Dec. 7, to West Van birthday girl Renate Griffiths ... And ditto that day to West Van Kiwanian Brock Webber (whose date we flubbed last week!). Oca WRIGHT OR WRONG: Stress is when your mouth says “yes” and your gut says ” Administration Display Advertising Real Estate Advertising Classified Advertising Newsroom Distribution Display & Real Estate Fax Newsroom Fax Classified, Accounting & Main Office Fax Michael Becker - News Editor 985-2131 (114) Andrevs McCredie - Sports/Cornmunity Editor 985-2131 (147) The North Shore News is published by North Shore Free Press Ltd., Publisher Peter Speck, from 1139 Lonsdale Avenue North Vancouver, B.C., V7M 24 a Sanity