May 25, 1988 News 985-2131. | ‘A: NORTH Vancouver landscape ‘architect’ will sue ‘to Stop’ cy and moun-' 1 Welsh to “commence: legal action. ‘Harry Hegs td‘said, ‘felirement/, Home,. My wife and 1 ove back here when the. to his: 4077 St. Georg Ave. erty on three’ separate ‘occasions |; Ji Tuesday, her m this year: Jan. 5, “April 3, May 13. " lives in* “Lyin rently. ‘renting his» ee ‘Avenue property," has istrict botllevard: adjacent ‘, consequently instructed the" Van-,» “an-.18-inch diameter Douglas. fir : ‘and, six four-to-six-inch /diameter, « “compensatic on. -for’., couver Taw. fi rmi/ of. Eastwood ind gard has: distributed to area’ resi- dents ‘a’ circular ‘outlining: the. en- “apainst a..North. Vancouver-based ' vironmental. ‘vandalism and ‘erected | tree cutting | “firm in“ connection “a large ‘sign’on the: boulevard! ure. “with the Jan! 5: incident’ in- which @ ing | jwhoever : ris': ;havitig the," tree: felled’ to): {Stop , ‘cutting | ‘and: ‘start consulting other people in the: area. nd his! fence.” j, District « director of “engi ing’ Joha anyone cutting trees (on “district | company , is ain ° , hroperty must havea permit.. Vestigating the matter and: will, ad- a “But he”! said trees’ are: ‘felled 8 ise‘ Haggard as to the suit’s “feasi-,! ‘without permits on ‘district land’: bility next-week. 77 “all 100. ‘often. It’s very: ‘unfortu- Haggard says he ‘wants financial ate." People think; if: a, tree blocking. ‘their view? or. casting, fence and ‘the’ time ‘and ‘effort he: shadows’ on their property and it’s ; put into hauling’ away iwo loads’ of on: district property, they: are: free: trée debris. 02.2 Oo a to go and remove it; but there isa definite . procedure hey must" a wood said » gy “In addition to legal action, Ha “follow.” , rie ‘ "Trees will only " be. removed, _ Bremner? said, Jf they« present” a - danger to’ ‘adjacent, properties or. af neighbors ave” been - ‘polled . and s approve tree’ removal. cs ; Brenner said'no district permits iwere given for’ felling: trees on the,’ t 5 Meitsihan c arges’, ill be laid. te anyone:: caught / cutting . district irees illegally, he’ said. i" The” district; “Bremner: added, ‘had considered: laying: charges in; ‘connection with, the “Jan: {5 tree’. “felling” that ‘dimaged» Flagard's fence, but Crown pros ecutors con-*, idered ‘the available vidence to ibe’ en ‘insuffi icient.’. -,;