ar, Bureau, while the YMCA wl receive $8:077 ‘receive $2, 200, v8 : te Other: organizations app: oThis.sum ©'was. one of, a wl the ease with which money *"@an“be transferred: within. - survive if. it’ followed. gov- - broadly defined appropria- - ernment procedures." “ - - .tlons and the extént: oR ">." ” which surpluses have’ been * oe Mr. Huntington: has. ‘been ‘available . under ” existing _ busy in ‘recént.weeks on the. - burigetary ‘methods, an . Public Atcounts, wiaine the. ee at Ottawa, “examining the. “The central agency of the. “ guditor-general’s' report ‘on.’ .' government ‘responsible: ‘what the government; does,” for prescribing standards, © ‘with our money : Pac aiiien thaahae Warne Proposed | ‘development. ‘of | “contacted. earle,” he told “audits should give greater . ‘an.* ‘aguatle village’: at’ the | eounell, re rT emphasis . to... monitoring foot ot Pemberton » departmental” “ednternal © 188 ecome.a:major ‘concern audits: ‘aovan to:e encourage | | to Seaspen International Ltd a greater adherence to. stan-. ‘ aor 8 ” ne ae _ ; ‘ Three thousand ; dollars. g go. "The: ‘ grant-in-ald approved : ‘to: the. Greater. Vancouver “for ‘North Shore: United: Convention ” and: "Visitors" Neterans Counell was $75. ° ' “We tindeaya a For a new Hair Do this. - Mr. Lindsay also e a ed: deep’ say als core | sopointn make an meaty negative effect’’. that. the... proposed development ‘of a. ay prlg Ale : 4 Val 1 Mon: 3 Rea ‘ an o _feorentional hee lot would: \ mY Pa ay, Rod “A. Lindsay,: pres-."have’“on’ the company’s: - JM “of. Mr, Huntington ha word ident of Seaspan, complained | -operations, | ‘ og Canada’s new suditer-gen- about the clos eases: “Several : aldermen. agreed. ; | eral’: ‘who’ with: “outside. “No rth Vancouver Distti et. " assistance | is oring exter | : he: ‘Gidssco. mely hard and ably to bring : ..some order into the manage: Sa Hangagien 1962, he . ment of our nation’s affairs. b ‘more important’ piece '. cy f work: or:the 0 “that! Seaspan, as a corporate ‘citizen: “and * ‘neighboring L... u ulte urprised that property owner should have. -. — ing*'an ‘adjacent |: been’ kept’ more’ up ‘to. date. oe ‘owner was’ not: regatding plans for the area, ae “ount. far ‘the Taallty ot spending or the quality: of” ‘management ‘within, depart. ments, “ - Critical padeages of the’ - @uditor-general’s- ., feport quoted: by Mr, Huntington. in’. th a oe epee of. his: condemnation: Include’ the. following: . - aD “The study. leads: to” one .. +. ¢lear conclusion:. the ‘pres:"; |: "ent stateof the: financial”: |: aa “management | ‘and: control |: “ pystems.. of” ‘departments ae : ‘and, agencies. of the Goy-. ||: » os) @rnment..of. Canada »{s ; "S shgnificantly, below. accepts, i fa : -\ able’ standards of | ‘quality. - ~ » and effectventes., oe Hay ga Pua ter up be ly ay 4 ann sitesi ‘ eave tl wi ures “ ed ad Scr ep ES es ' it Motrapo " Vancouver overall... The: : ‘ago. North: Shore ‘famil - Income {a 26. por cont ‘higher. : , woe, nt a Ta iy aq , , : ‘ 1 } t my rood " " vot ‘ ' ’ 1 : - ‘ sone wg . : , " Fe io Ns Lermnmermeerameemmmas oieerarinyeaeym eats myn mtiremynoniedetmtymraiesjmmmnieritenmemanamatHmstin ennemen mrimraeamedsinmnn Bf aera . . ‘ " Hew i i * ; ‘ mo ‘ /', OWR:.tWo. of | thro’ : fend more than'the average’: ‘ home.’ pipe and | Fy : Ade gee urles: a ae ’ : : H 4 me oO: and ' " nn: Fi _ / : ‘ ” . , TH F ' or ‘ : prices’ trot 570) 00: boris 7 $80 0,000'are' no No t ( a many ‘the larger. condos |. ER CLT units. bulle-In recent.’ Be ‘More than two ‘out of: every” three North Shore: households aro. Owner-ocd ‘ By : : -jDprimatey , “Of the: North Vane i 1; nearniens aren vite : . Meat we cae 4p . a aha, ae . nite \ he) ‘ shaaiany Ve : oe ; i - ‘ ‘ \ ve , Cyan il see ke SRE Te aLeent uh uy whey pale rah ah De eR Le eh eS re