ne ca gr rene ee ao itil ta salads INSIGHTS Well it is a hard choice... a AT aed > C thelesr—— No shows non-confidence in handling of agreement Dear Editor: The Reform Party of! British Columbia rejects the proposed amendment to the Constitution of Canada because, on balarce, it ‘does not reflect the fairness or ’ equality Canadians expect. The constitutional document takes away fzom the democratic principles on which Canada was founded, and we strongly urge all our members and all other reform-minded pe ple to vote No. - The 83% of British Columbians who demonstrated their belief in democracy by voting for initiative and recall in the lust provincial election should also vote No. Is it democratic to require that votes be cast on the basis of gender equality? Is it democratic to depart from representation by population by guaraniceing that Quebec be assigned no fewer than 25% of the seats in the House of Com- mons? Is it democratic to give one province the right to veio any change on future amendments to the Senate, the Supreme Court or the House cf Commons? {fs it democratic to entrench in Canada’s Constitution the right of one province, namely Quebec, to become a distinct socicty over all other provinces within Canada? fs it democratic to ask Cana- dians to vote Yes to a consti- tutional package in which many clauses have yet to be finalized? To vote No on Oct. 26 is not a rejection of any individual orga- nized group or province. Rather, it_ is a statement of non-con- fidence of the manner in which our politicians have handled these proposed constitutional amend- ments. Ronatd Gamble, president Reform Party of B.C. Nation’s crisis foisted onto us Dear Editor: Somehow we Canadians have got ourselves into a situation in which we are suddenly totally responsible for either the fragmentation and economic ruin of our country or else, if we so choose, its bounteous and eternal prosperity. All we have to do is follow the recommended party line this month to render one of these scenarios a fact. How did you and I come to be suddenly invested with such awesome power? Well, it seems our political masters have been working non-stop for the last de- cade on matters constitutional and have finally reached the point where they are unable to reach a workable compromise. So they have decided to foist the responsibility for the nation’s crisis onto us! Here we are, then, at Canada’s wake-or-break point — courtesy of our fearless leaders —- and ei- ther way, it will all be our fault! What was so terrible with the old Constitution anyway? At least it didn’t threaten instant destruc- tion at the whim of undecided voters who can’t understand what we're voting for anyway! Thanks a lot guys — here’s another fine mess you've got us into! Calin Levois North Vancouver Leaders ignoring essence of democracy Dear Editor: AS a younger member of Cana- dian society, I would like to ex- plain why I feel that voting ‘‘no’’ to the constitutional deal is of utmost importance. The agreement reached by the governments dealt a cruel blow to the forces of democracy that have been prevalent in this country for the past 125 years. By guaranteeing Quebec 25% of the overall representation in parliament, regardless of Quebec’s population, the “‘leadezs’’ of this country have ignored the essence of a democratic nation. A “‘yes’ is avote against repre- sentation by population. A ‘‘no”’ is a vote for democratic principles. Ryas Jaye North Vancouver Friday, October 16, 1992 - North Shore News ~ 7 Collins Meeched ~ out of his pants I'VE COME to believe that when the soul of Doug Collins finally attempts to pass through the pearly white gates (Whaddya mean, I need immigration papers!) his tongue will be the last thing to greet eternity. Some angel (probably Rosemary Brown) will have to beat that thing to death with a stick. Of course, I’m assuming he’s heading in that direction. Many would tell! me I’m being too kind, and that a special corner of Hades is being refurbished just to ac- commodate the old warrior. Beelzebub — ‘‘Collins? Oh, yes. Your room is right here sir. Enjoy your stay. ... Yes I know the room is filled with black aboriginal Jewish lesbian im- migrants, and yes they are all prominent members of NOW, However, this is HELL, sir. By the way, here's your trident. 1 think you’re going to need it."’ The trouble with Doug is that he frets too much. He is, after all, al an age when he has earned the tight to worry less about the state of the nation, and more, say, about the state of his dentures. (This is Tuesday. Should { brush or soak?) Instead, as in a recent column for instance, he’s straining his prostate fuming over the B.C, Treaty Commission signing held on Sept. 21 at the Capilano teserve. In his column, Doug painis a picture of the feather-bedecked Mulroney end Harcourt, dancing around the floor while Chief Joe Mathias sings ‘‘All you need is love."’ Collins is way off base. I was there. The actual words of the song were ‘‘E can’t gct no satisfac- HF Lad Maybe his hearing is going as well, Doug goes on to say that Mr. Chief Justice Altian McEachern of the B.C. Supreme Court judged that the Indians have no title in this province. He neglects to point out thar the Chief Justice, in commenting on the judgment, said that he didn’t consider his decision to be the last word on this case. In fact, McEachern fully ex- pected an appeal. Perhaps Doug had to take a nap before he got to that part. He accuses John Crosbie of “hiding behind the Sparrow court case”’ in allowing Indians to seii fish commercially — even though provincial legislation, prior to the court -Gecision, trampled on aboriginal fishing rights guaran- teed under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Paul are HUGHES’ VIEWS is Doug’s sense of balance go- ing as well? But then, he seems not over- fond of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The Human Rights Act he calls ‘‘scabrous.’’ What was that war he fought in about if not to guarantee rights and freedoms? Memory loss, I guess. Doug ends his column by quoting Elmer Knudsen who ap- parently admits uttering this gem: “tt is true that the forefathers of these aboriginals lived here first, but they did not build a na- tion. ... All they did was follow the buffalo. We built roads, cities, bridges, railroads and a pro- sperous nation.”’ Knudsen does not choose to glorify some of our other ac- complishments. He seems to have forgotten we also brought this land plagues of smallpox, the devastation of alcohol, pollution, and a social system totally alien to the first people here, Mind you, to be fair, we did have the decency to wipe out all the buffalo. At least the Indians don’t have to follow them any _more. {t seems to me this nation could stand a tad less ‘‘prosperity’’ and a smidgeon more ‘“‘humanity.”" F'm fairly certain, though, that Doug’s old eyes don't see it that way. What with his ears not -hear- ‘ing too well, his memory. shot, and his balance being a little wobbly (| made up the bit about the teeth) I suggest it won’t be too long before the whole Collins’ structure undergoes a complete coilapse. Even, perhaps, the tongue? . Nah. Why a referendum at all? Dear Editor: Re: the referendum. The 10 premiers and the fed- eral government can agree to a set of principles — as well as the leaders of our three na- tional parties in the House of Commons — then surely, since they are our democratic repre-, sentatives, we all should agree (why a referendum at all?). Any contract is only as good as the parties signing it wish it to be. I have always found in life, the shorter the better — as long as there is goodwill! be- tween the parties concerned. Whether the constitution says that ‘‘Canadians’’ . are commited to gender equality between men and women, or it says ‘‘Canadians and the gov- ernment” or just ‘‘Canada’’ is of no concern. Women’s equality is a force that is here to stay, whether it is in the Constitution or not. It is a force that will prevail, never mind the legal text. All of a sudden we have 27 million lawyers in Canada! The spirit is the thing, NOT the fine text. Ralph Herzstein West Vancouver