1139 Lonsdale Avenue North Vancouver, B.C. PETER SPECK Publisher 995-2131 {101) ~. Managing Editor’. - 985-2131 (116) - -” Distribution Managet «Production Manager 90-1337 (iam) eae-2int (tz oe Borer ee ryt sary it: ec imananaes: ETE era abe THRE ae , Accounting @ Dein Office Fax North Skore Mewa, founded in 1969 as an independent suburban newsprper and qualified ‘under Schedule 111, Paragraph 111 of the Excise Tax Act, is published each Wednerday, Friday and Sunday by North Shore Free Press Led, and dtistributed to every door on the Noch : Shore, Canada Post Canadian Publications Mail Sales Product Agreement No. 0087238, Mailing rates available on request. Entire contents ~ © 1996 North Shore Free Press Ltd. All rights reserved, jews wiew port nie aed eth jasty bits “ANY POLITICAL pundits have been quick to teil us British Columbians that we are weather- ing the fiscal storms rather well here in the western coastal hinterland. It’s the other provinces, our poor cousins the traditional have-not previnces and those provinces whose economies have been rav- aged by fitful industrial. circumstance and poor political management, that are really in the soup. ‘But bad news on two fronts should tem- per any smug chest-thumping the NDP gov- ernment will doubtless try to inflict upun us as the election season begins in earnest. The first nasty bit came from the pen of George Morfitt, B.C.’s auditor-general. Despite the press garnered last year by ‘the NDP’s announcement of a new hard-line deal for cheating and out-of-province in- migrating welfare recipients, the spending on income assistance has jumped by. 103% over the past five years, from $888 million in 1990 to $1.8 billion last year. While B.C.’s population’ grew by. 12% over the same period, 73% of the increase in the province’s income assistance bili is due to more welfare recipients in B.C. Meanwhile the number of unemployment ~ insurance claimants in B.C. rose for a fifth consecutive month. October’s rise. in claimants was 2.6%, for a benefits payout to 84,600 British Columbians. | But Morfitt says there are even more B.C. residents on welfare. From ‘the perspective of at least one North Shore private investi- gator, the estimated welfare fraud rate locally may De as high as 40%. All is not well in La- La;Land and don’t let the spin doctors tell you otherwise. t Indian land ci WHATEVER HAPPENED to Indian land claims? In the media, Quebec and economic woes temporarily drowned them out for 11 weeks, that’s all. Audiences can stand only so much drama, especially over Christmas. But rest assured, the whole Indian mess is still there, and with a few new twists for you to ponder. The first being a growing demand by municipalities to be heard when land claims are being discussed. The B.C. government is sympathet- Noel " ic, but basically the Indians don't Larry Gitlanders who says B.C. no longer owes its natives a single cent in either land or cash. He maintains that the Terms of Union bringing B.C. into Confederation in 1871 transferred ali further obligations regarding native land claims from the province to the federal govern- ment. That means Ottawa should pay B.C. for any land it hands over to settle a land claim. So certain is Gillanders of his argument that he's filed a writ against both governments in the B.C. Supreme Court, seeking a court declaration that B.C. has already satisfied all its constitution- al responsibilities for native rights. and yon en neiteren att enn Hell bent aioe seunetaan anges Rate er rmaetarieste | want city fathers (or mothers) any- where near the negotiating table. Pressed by Victoria, however, Indian negotiators have now agreed - to let municipalities join the talks— . provided they are gagged with signed promises not to reveal most of what they learn there. if land and rights giveaways go as expected, municipalities may often be the jurisdictions most directly affected. But how — given the enforced secrecy — can they possibly serve the interests of their citizens if they can’t tell the latter what's happening in the talks? So three cheers for West Van Mayor Mark Sager, who has the 2,550-member Squamish Band, the region’s biggest, in his backyard. Heading the protest against this “marginalizing” of local govern- ment, he has threatened to lead a municipal boycott of treaty negotia- tions —- which would doubtless delight the Indians but badly embarrass Victoria. Then there’s Social Credit leader * Meanwhile, Liberal leader Gordon Campbell and Reform leader Jack Weisgerber both insist they will radically revise the entire treaty negotiation process if they defeat the NDP in the looming election. To the horror of the 48 aborigi- nal groups already in negotiation Campbell promises public hearings on pending agreements and free votes in the legislature before they are implemented. Finally, a grim prophecy from ie EIA Ba ND Outraged by YOA | legislation | Dear Editor: What do we have to do as citizens’ to change the Young Offenders Act? The Brent Swatridge story, and others like it, absolutely outrage me. To begin with, it’s unfortunate that I must use the victim's name to | j identify the story because guilty “youths” cannot be named. (And I can’t tell you how sick I am_of the phrase “cannot be». identified as stipulated in the Young Offenders Act.”) a ' How abuut an act of some sort for the victims? Shouldn't we know who might potentially ~ bludgeon us? I digress. :. 7 [ cannot begin to understand « the mentality of these cowardly * ; wimps who outnumber. and... “outweapon” _-_ individuals - because of, say, an errant glance or a nasty ‘name ‘or, worse still, being told what to do. Hey, 15- -year-old youth who ‘cannot be identified. because you beat Brent Swatridge over. the head with a solid metal bar, you are a cowardly wimp’ and so are the “gentleman escorts who backed you" up ‘wielding » Machetes and knives. You’ all: crime.my name. would be be lished and I could be! sentenced: we don’t want to upset our little’ darlings with ans wal terms urge anyone with child: young or teens, to. write, to someone, anyone, who can. and change the i Insanity. David Bryant |= 90: North Vancouver : “Fraser Institute policy analyst: ‘ Owen Lippert: the treaty process” will neither succeed nor fail: because no party can take the P ical risk of either stopping the: °4 negotiations or actually concludin all possible.treaties. Meaning’ the ; process can drag on forever, with everyone increasingly miserable o or, outraged. His solution: distribute all ; Crown land in equal fee-simple ©: | shares to every British Columbian, native and non-native. Then let | them work out who gets how much by buying, trading, selling — or ° even private gifts. That alone, ; Lippert says, can stop native Jand. politicking. - Never say the Indian land claims ee issue is dull! . eee ENJOY stars Candus Churchil Lovie Eli, Leora Cashe; Tom’ Pickett and Jaye Krebs in a 7:30 Evening of Gospel Song Sunda Jan. 21 at West Van United © Church, 21st and Esquimalt — .~ | tickets ($12) 926-3690, 921-6005." | WRIGHT OR WRONG: Don’ t entertain an idea; put it to work, a