. MONDAYS Pregnant Moms support group. meets every Monday, . 819 Chesterfield, N.V. For. those who are jow income, ‘single: parents, . aboriginal or ‘new “ ‘Brants. Info: 990-9401. Bill 65, the Labour Statutes ‘Amendment Act; corrects the nonsensical technicaliry : that made - ivillegal for. hairdressers to actually cut hair! ~ Bill 63, the Wildlife Amendment Act, makes‘ it illegal to feed dangerous w wild animals: ‘And the list gpes on. - : robate Fes: “Introduced on April 19, this bil ‘confirmed i in’ law the Practice of charging probate feeson =~. “estates over $25,000 in value, This came in...‘ “Lae view of the fact thar the Supreme Court of ; Canada had ruled chat probate fees could 7 Rot oe ’ be levied by. regulation. The BC Official °. ~ Opposition ¢ debared againsé Bill 35 arguing - ~ thar this ix fact was a ‘form ‘of double or even - - * eriple taxation. When | you impose a fee on the ”. value of people's estates, you are taxing what” - has already been taxed. at least once. This *. - amounts co:double taxation. Now, if an os , - already | taxed i income was invested in: some “assets, which appreciated over time, then at. * some point those assets. ‘may have been _ subjected to a capital gains tax. In this case, aa the probate fee becomes triple taxation. “Fee” is really'a misnomer. The Supreme, Court of Canada made it pretty clear that :- the probate fee is really a tax and, as such, . must be legislated. This Sill then, by legislating retroactively back to 1988, rankes it Legal for the government to collect what. " ‘was collected illegally before! The bill passed” -on May 5, 1999, with h government voting for and opposition voting against it. One wonders if this legislation would open the door to the concept of a “wealth tax”. Pension Benefits Standards Amendment Act (Bill. 58) — Introduced on May-11, this bill gives pension plan administrators) authority to suspend the pension benefits of an early retiree who goes back to work for a non-union employer in the same field. The_ .. government introduced this very same measure in its ill-fated Bill 44 in 1997. Although che minister in charge insisted that | the bill only applied to 33 multi-employer,” plans, during debate; he’ conceded ‘that ‘sh provision could indeed be extended to oo include others, That extension would be done. by regulation and through a Cabine : rrde : favast nos ne other jurisdiction Cs tada has enacted such legislatio t : thi; BC Official Opposition vehemently * 2 agued against this bill. And again, the hot so" maajority 1 nuled. FF "you baie experienced governm - bike to ‘hear from 3 you,