WHEN I saw the full-page ad in The Globe and Mail, | did a double take. By Catherine Atyeo Contributing Writer But yes, there he was in black and white. Decked out in a casual suede jacket, worn over a trendy patterned shirt with coordinating belt and pants and topped off by a jaunty wool plaid beret. He had the look. He had the style, And all of eight years old. No way any eight-year-old boy wants to return to the schoolyard looking like he just came from a G@Q cover shoot, And if a lot of cight-year-old kids out there are being encouraged by adults to place primary importance on & stunningly coordinated wardrobe, then this society's value systems are in more trouble than | thought. The ad in The Globe and Mail reminded me of an experience | had in San Francisco three years ago. My mother, sister and I were shopping in a department store in a section beside the children's clothing area. | glanced over and saw two parents occupicd with outfitting their young son, who must have been about cight. The father put a navy wool sweater with an English hunting scene on his son. When the family had left, con- sumed by curiosity, | walked over and looked at the price of the sweater. It was $230. I used to justify such expen- ditures by saying, OK, if you've worked hard and made a fot of moncy, you darned well have the right to buy your kid a $236 sweater. And even Jesus, the oriz- Friday, September 13, 1991 — North Shore News - 7 INSIGHTS style Mint Gather MCPTH SHORE WEWS. inal social rebel, said the poor (and by implication, the rich) will always be with us. Of course, individuals have the right to spend their money in the way they choose. But surely as parents we have a responsibility to pass on other values to children, Collins’ AIDS views are simply ‘fear-mongering’ Dear Editor: J have been asked by coa- cerned readers of the North Shore News to respond to Doug Collins’ column entitled ““When it comes to AIDS, human rights can be wrong”’ (August 7). Dr. Lorraine Day, the cen- tral figure of the article, is an orthopedic surgeon from San Francisco General Hospital. Dr. Day’s arguments, unfor- tunately, tend to be based on partial truths and anecdotal ev- idence. For example, it is cer- tainly well-known that HfV has been recovered from peripheral blood, semen, saliva, tears, alveolar fluid, cerebrospinal fluid, brain tissue, and cervical and vaginal secretions. . What people like Dr. Day often neglect to mention con- cerning the isolation of HIV in saliva, for example, is that HIV could be recovered from the saliva of only I in 71 AIDS patients, and was present only in extremely low concentration in the single positive culture. They also ignore the fun- damental fact that the mere presence of the virus in a tissue or fluid is not sufficient to establish that the particular tissue or fluid represents a mode of HIV transmission. Factors determining whether a tissue or fluid can give rise to transmission include the con- centration and viability of the virus within the tissue or fluid: access io the tissue or fluid to a portal of entry into a suscepti- ble host; local host immune defences at or near the site of entry; and access to the in- vading agent to target cells or tissues. People like Mr. Collins and Dr. Day fear monger concern- ing casual contact. First, of the over 100,000 cases of AIDS reported in North America to date, no cases have occurred in the fam- ily member of an AIDS patient which could not be explained on the basis of other estab- lished risk factors. Second, a number of prospective studies have monitored several hun- dred family members or close contacts of AIDS patients and/or HIV-infected persons for indications of HIV infec- tion. The types of contacts that were experienced over protong- ed periods of time in’ these studies included the sharing cof toiets, baths, kitchens, dishes, cating utensils, combs, toothbrushes, razors, as well as close body contact. Often, family members would clothe, bathe, and feed persons with AIDS daily for up to two years or more. None of these studies has documented instances of HIV infection which could not be attributed to established modes of transmission. Given hundreds of thousands and perhaps millions of people infected with HIV and living among us in North America, if HIV could be spread by casual contact where are the thousands of bystanders who have been casually infected with this virus? If Mr. Collins is right, and he is certainly not, then using his exampies, thousands of nurses and doctors should be dead from being ‘‘breathed’’ upon by people with AIDS, thousands of restaurant patrons should be dead from eating contaminated food, and hundreds if not thousands of children shouid be dead from nosebleeds in the schoolyard. Proponents of the casual contact fear-mongering school of thought must be challenged to produce evidence of these myriads of cases of AIDS rather than the usual 1 or 2 anecdotes. Martin T. Schechter, MSc, PhD Faculty of Medicine, UBC National Advisory Committee on AIDS MD, In the face of the gluttonous consumerism of our North Amer- ican society, parents have to take a stand for values other than those paraded through advertising and shopping malls. When [ say take a stand, Pm not talking about denying a child who comes to you once or twice a year for that hot pair of runners. I'm talk- ing about inculcating the belief in children that, while clothes can be fun, something as superficial as clothes is not of central impor- tance in life. PE went to a high school that was particularly ruthless when it came to judging individuals by their apparel, mainly because of the sororities and fraternities that set the dress code for the entire school population, At my high school, there was a relatively small elite who knew The Way To Dress and intimi- dated the heck out of the rest of us who had no money. fashion sense or self-esteem. But even in my pubescent con- fusion I looked at the princesses of fashion in my school and told myself. **This is crap." I could hardly wait to get out of there. In university you could wear jeans, or whatever, and no- body would single you out. Don’t get me wrong, | was no Mother Theresa. But in my 16- year-old mind J knew that this ex- cessive importance given to clothes was nonsense. Perhaps because my parents tried to pass on to me what they believed was really of value in life — family, friends of different backgrounds and cultures, the joy of learning through book:. and travel, music and a spiritual life. f think there are still parents like mine — at least I sure hope there are. Additional tips on avoiding AIDS virus Dear Editor: Thank you for publishing Mr. Collins’ insightful article on AIDS (August 7). As a service to your readers ! have condensed the main points in Mr. Collins’ article. Additional suggestions are also provided to help them avoid what Mr. Collins has so delicately described as “Gay Botch.”’ 1. Consider doing your own dental work. To this end } recommend a new series of do-it- yourself books available at better book stores everywhere. Biggest seller to date is ‘‘The Twenty Minute Root Canal.’’ In the fall 1 understand the series will be ex- tended to incisde almost all surgical operations. 2. Do not sit on toilet seats. To help you in this, | draw your at- tention to a handy suspension system which is available in most department stores. One size fits most North Shore cubicles, and the device folds up compactly so that it can be carried around in the average purse or funch bucket. The system should be operated with care, however. A number of instances have been reported where the system failed, leading to rather disastrous consequences. 3.Don’t play soccer with homos. In fact, with all the pansy kissing and hugging, not to men- tion the disgusting bum-patting that goes on during soccer games, tt may be safer not to play soccer at all. David Reid Vancouver Collins terms ‘shocking’ Dear Editor: As a newcomer to the North Shore, | revel in the friendliness, freshness of the air and sense of community. I suppose nothing is perfect, but the difficulty I have is finding Doug Collins’ incorrect, and therefore, offensive, columns in my community newspaper. Recent columns on AIDS and ‘‘human rights,’’ with terms such as “*homo-lovers’” and ‘organized Jewry’’ shock me. International experts on AIDS, no longer a new disease, indicate no doubt that it is only transmissible through the ex- change of body fluids, namely blood, semen, and vaginal fluid. Secondly, the decision has been made repeatedly through our Supreme Courts that it is not ac- ceptable for a teacher or writer to deny the reality of the Holocaust publicly in the classroom or through published works. These are the judgments of the experts. | accept them more than | accept Doug Collins’ opinions. Carol Longman North Vancouver