Council cooperation needed | Open fetter to North Vancouver City mayor and council: . The negative comments by North Vancouver City council surrounding the issue of a tunnel crossing has once again pitted residents of North Vancouver against those of West Vancouver. Unfortunately these remarks have created an “us versus them” attitude which does nothing to help unearth positive solutions for a third cross- ing to the North Shore. North Vancouver City council comments indicated a tunnel crossing would oaly be about solving the traffic problems of West Vancouver and the community of Horseshoe Bay, and that West Vancouver residents couldn't detach them- selves from their cars as a means of transporta- tion. Both of these remarks are simply unfound- ed and ignorant. Iwe are to find any common ground on this issue We must turn away from the negatives and concentrate on how we can make a tunnel work for everyone on the the North Shore. We must focus on the positives of all the run- nel proposals, which along with automobile trat- fic could include the addition of a light rail or tain line — alternative forms of transportation which today are not yet available to the North Shore. I urge you as a newly elected council, to focus on the commuter challenges which face North and West Vancouver, and seriously look at the positive solutions a tunnel crossing would bring to the North Shore. Only by working together can we bring about constructive dialogue that will address the third crossing concerns in both our communi- ties. Ted Nebbeling, MLA West Vancouver-Garibaldi RCMP lauded for standoff actions Dear Editor: This fetter is in response to the incident that hap- pened in Lynn Valley on Feb. 6 (see North Shore News, Feb. 9). manner, 5.15% Year 2 \WEW. CANADA SAVINGS BONDS T was in the church at that time and I must say that the RCMP conducted selves in a very professional They took every precau- tion to protect the public from injuries. I'm glad that we have the RCMP te protect us. RJ. Gelling North Vancouver them- 6.25% Annual compound cate of 5.74% for Year 3 C-boad if held for 3 years. Canad ted white, m.p. advertorial, February 23. 2000 HROC AND SHAWINIGATE HRDC AND SHAWINIGATE In my report last week | mentioned that the uproar in Parliament over Human Resources Sevelopment Canada (HRDC) grants actually had jis roots back in che Spring of 1999. That was when Reform MPs first began ask- ing the Prime Minister questions about a series of grants given to businesses in his Riding of St. Maurice. What fol- lows is some background information on Shawinigate, as it has come to be knewn, much of which has not yet been fully expiored in the mainstream media. TRANSELEC INC. On August 27, i996 a company, Transelec inc, owned by one of the Prime Minister's friends, Claude Gauthier, was selected by CIDA (Canadian international Development Agency) to receive a $6.3 million contract for electrica! work in Mali. However, the selection process for award- ing the contract was immediately criticized as “secretive” by a competitor from ¥ Ontario, and the contract was not finalized at that time. About two weeks later, on September 9, 1996 Mr Gauthier incorpcrated a new com- pany, 3293475 Canada Inc., and on September 25, 1996 that company pur- | chased a parce! of undeveloped land from another company, 161341 Canada inc. (The Prime Mirister held a 25% interest in 161341 Canada Inc. unti! he sold the shares in November of 1S99). The land is | situated beside the Grand Mere Golf Course, which is also owned by 161341 Canada inc., and the price paid for the land by Mr Gauthiers new company was $525,000. About 9 months later, during the run-up to the 1997 election, Transelec Inc donat- ed $10,000 to Mr Chretien's campaign. Then, on November 7, 1997, after the Liberals had been returned to power, Transelec Inc received final approval for the $6.3 million CIDA contract. in addition, one of Mr Gauthier's other companies, Continental Paving, was contracted to | pave the road leading to the Prime Ministers cottage. Continental received this contract from the father-in-law of a Mr Yvon Duhaime, who had been awarded the untendered contract, worth $190,000, to build the road and a guardiiouse. Yvon Ouhaime owns a hotel, the Auberge {nn Grand Mere, which is also adjacent to the Grand Mere Golf Course, ard was listed, at the time, as housing the Head Office ot 161344 Canada Inc . AUBERGE INN #1 As mentioned above, the Auberge Inn Grand-Mere belongs to a Mr Yvon Duhaime and lies adjacent to the Grand- Mere Golf Course in the Prime Minister's Riding. The hotel houses the registered office of 161341 Canada Inc, a company in which the Prime Minister held a 25% inter- est, until he sold the shares last November. A Transitional! Jobs Fund grant of $164,000 was awarded to Mr Duhaime at a press conference on May 28, 1997, just four days before the lasi election, and i almost two months before the grant received Ministerial approval. The TJF is the program presently under attack by Reform for sloppy bookkeeping and its apparent use as a slush fund to reward Liberal cupporters.) Mr Duhaime also received a $615,000: loan. from -the Business Development Bank in 1997, : along with $50,000 from the Federal: Regional Development Fund, and £60,799 . in five different HADC- wage subsidy grants. The total contributed diractly or indirectly. by taxpayers to Mr Duhaime's business over two years amounted to | $889,799. ; ; _ IN SUMMARY ln summary then, a company (161341 « Canada inc) in which the Prime Minister held 25% of the shares, owned the Grand- | Mere Golf Course and had its Head Cffice hote! received a number of grants and foans totalling $889,799. A company owned by a friend of the Prime Minister, Mr Gauthier, purchased land next to the Golf Course, from 161341 Canada inc, for $525,000. Mr Gauthier's companies later received @ $6.3 million contract from CIDA, and an untendered contract for $190,000 to pave the road leading to the Prime | Minister's cottage. Reform has argued in Parliament that these transactions had the effect of raising the value of the Goi Course by subsidizing the operations of the hotel with public money, and establish- ing a value for the surrounding iand. In Parliament, under Reform question- ing, the Prime Minister insisted that he had sold his shares to a real estate developer in Toronto, Mr Jonas Prince, a few days before becoming Prime Minister, but Mr Prince stated in the press that he only pur- chased an optien to buy the shares and never exercised that option. As a result. the Ethics Counsellor told Mr Chretien that he would have to publicity declare his own- ership of the shares in 161347 Canaaa Inc. if he could not arrange a sale. For two more years though, the Prime Minister contiriuad to deny ownership of the shares, only admitting it by default when he | announced, in parliament in November of 1999, that he had finally sold them. AUBERGE INN #2 While there are a number of other examples of extravagant taxpayer grants in the Riding of St. Maurice, one of the most notable is a series of grants and loans to a $6.4 million hotel project, the Auberge Inn Gouverneur Shawinigan, owned by Pierre Thibault, a businessman from Belgium. Mr Thibauid's company was iniiially awarded $600,000 on March 13, | 1997 under the HRDC Targeted Wage Subsidy Program, but Mr Thibault claimed that he needed capital immediately and { could not afford to wait for wage subsidies, so the grant was changed to become part | of the now discredited Transitional Jobs | Fund (TJF) program. This grant to Mr Thibauld’s company did not adhere to the TJF guidelines, was announced without any departments! paperwork in place, and advertised in Mr Chretien's MP Householder to constituents just before the election was called in 1997. : : In September of 1998 Mr Thibauld's company received a $400,000 uneecured foan from Canada _— Economic _ Development ‘for Quebec Regions, which is a federal regional economic devel-.. opment fund’ you probably did. not ever know existed. Then in January cf 1999 Mr Thibauld received yet. another. $100,000 ‘under the TJF, to supplement a $925,000 . Iocan from the Business Development § Bank. So by January of 1999 taxpayers: | had directly or indirectly . contributed $2,025,000, or almost one third of the total cost of the hotel project. No maiter what the Prime Minister claims in‘ Parliament; thé public funding cf private projocts in this.:f , manner is simply not acceptable: to the, majority of tax payers in Canada... | In addition to the above, there were || serious problems with $1.2 million of af oe $2.04 million TF grant awarded: in 1987/88 to one of Rr Chretien's sup-.. porters, Rene Giguere. The money was “transferred, via_a complex trust. fund. ‘arrangement, to: a subsidiary of. Mr. |. .Giguere's company,’ which was then:P).- - purchased .by.-the’ Mir Gauthier of .j. Transelec inc mentioned in the. second paragraph of this report... The pur-: | chesed subsidiary, Placeteco, was put} - into. bankruptcy a few months tater, but. was immediately repurchased ; by. Mr: ‘Gauthier, who restimed operations with‘ “fess than half of the. staff previously:. employed, claiming he was. no longer: beund. by the HRDC hiring’ require-. ments. woes And who said there wasn't a Santa