6 ~ North Shore News -— Wednesday, December 8, 1999 ——VIEW POINT: ETTING down to business is former need only rurn to the latest getting more depressing in B.C. brainwave released by NDP leadership : YEP, SEZ. RIGHT A recently: released province- hopeful Joy MacPhail: raise B.C.’s , Le ‘wide business survey for the Vancouver minimum wage. Again. Thistime from =f i? HERE: “Give ME YouR Board of Trade has revealed that busi- $7.50 to a Her rationale: it’s an TIRED, YouR PLOR, YOUR ‘sues confidence in the B.C. economy is important step in fighting poverty. j HUDDLED MASHED YEARNING ' in the “danger” zone. That might be the case if anybody To BREATHE FREE, THES, ‘Small wonder with the economic , beyond politicians seeking votes thinks ar ee ecruse C4, ” Seain power currently holding office i in . business or anyone clse can afford that { if WRETCHED REFUSE 9,4, Victoria. © ~ increase. A recent survey of the Retail 7 oa | OF Your TEEMING ‘ The § survey found the business com- Merchants Association of B.C. certain- ¢_; -) SORES youn: Sic “munity’s overall. cconomic. confidence fy dossn’t. It found that 77% of inde- | | Poe , ON - : rat a pendent = retailers’ surveyed hire. , CANADIANS os unskilled entry-level workers, Half of a HOSPITAL. wear tentes - that number say another minimum = ff | - : "~ qwaige increase would ceduce the nurvi- ' ber of jobs available for those workers - and for young people and students. - .» Gyeat poverty fighter: price those at the bottom end of the job pool out of government rand lower taxation. . the market, Anyone Goubtin the need for: the . Welcome to the danger zone. IF you had any illusions that “She sent the Collins case against the. " 3 eens constitutionality of che Human Rights. BC's NDP led (ass 5 likely) Tribunal decision back for consideration. . by “moderate, oo . eo, 7 by ... the Human: respected Ujjat -. Rights Tribunal itself Dosanjh would Where are you, Alice: : again become an . > when we need you! as ‘When ‘you're ret ed Weight’s (Dee column; "is Seattle uproar our Voice too?” | - acceptable democ- of eight by accel és. don’t make safe products, treat their.’ ratic think our rotect ‘the environment, or.“uphold . party, 28” because they are “ordered” to. if: again, Fast. . a . 4 cts,’ nobody would buy them, |... Last week’s rejection ee ; : Quijano’s ruling in an se tha did would ‘sue the manufacturers. If compa- © \by the BC Supreme ‘ : oo plete. tort, first, to he ni loyees properly nobody would *-; Court of News ex- ear Se ck into vironment; look at what hap- | ‘colamnist Doug | ‘example. By. being careless arid allow Collins? appead against was forced to ; Human Rights 7 ‘Tribunal lem is moncy Great. gobs of it. Coltins is ation or. nel to ao a pe roa inch foe our good ‘And when trade barriers, arec!-sonor.group or. class of persons to: - a multitude. of items; it ends up costir hatred or contempt — despite ‘an earlier: 2 “= Human Rights, Tribunal having dis- ‘fleheing as much the same charges ag ‘one of" expression as for: the said Collis columns.) '.7 oo Resisting NDP tyrariny stan (short, a clear example‘of that judi-..« him many thousands and if, Guid like:to' ial: n6-no'— double jzdpardy. help —~ not Collins as niuchi Collins’: tie to the EC Supreme “Soe the address for: your’