- Friday, December 19, 1997 -- North Shore News ‘Minimum wage hikes hurt the poor Fazit Mihlar Fraser Institute Columnist UNTIL 1994 there appeared to be consen- sus among economists that minimum wage faws kill jobs and there- fore do not help - unskilled and youth - workers. ‘However, since the publi- cation of a revisionist article based on the 1992 New Jerscy * minimum-wage increase and its seemingly positive employ- ment impacts by Princeton University’s David Card and Alan Krueger, many anti- poverty advocates and liberal political and economic com- mentators have been urging ' ‘politicians to increase mini- ‘um wages In Brash Columbia, the ‘government has announced yet another increase in the | ‘minimum wage. -.,. This policy prescription, «however, will be disastrous for the poor. Any careful analysis - of the data shows thar mini- mum wage increases do kili Be acd. the. effects ofan 18% ‘ incréase. in New-Jersey’s mini- mum wage in 1992..by inca: | uary : : They used a group of " restaurants in eastern Pennsylvania : as their““con-- trol”, group, where there .was . he increase in Tee minhnum | :. minimum’ wages, employment ~** “increased by 2.5 employees _s-per restaurant compared to the control group in -* Pennsylvania. “A detailed analysis of the: “data done by the Employment Policies Institute, however, ”' found thiae the official payroll data does not match the Card- Krueger data. Using this data, Michigan’ State-University economist ’ David Neumark and William ’. Wascher of the Federal . Reserve Board figure that the actual impact of the 18% , increase in the minimum wage : tne reduce employment by june i Neumark a tina 1992 study. ‘Analyzing state panel data “for the period 1973-1989, they conclude that a 10% increase in the minimum wage causes a decline in employ- ment of 1% to 2% for teenagers, and 1.5% to 2% for young adults. In 1993, Bruce: Fallick of UCLA and Janet Currie of MIT concluded that teenagers were more likely to lose their jobs if the minimum wage was raised. According to a 1995 study by Neumark and Wascher, increases in the minimum wage raise the probability that ~ teenagers wil leave school in search of employment. However, by pricing teenage labor, which tends to be less productive, out of the market, higher minimuin wages effectively guaranice that these teenagers will not find work. Hence, minimum wage increases hurt teenagers in two ways: it encourages = Project Overview thers to leave school and increases their chances of being unemployed. In Canada, a study by Pierre Fortin found that the disemployment effects of min- imum wages had reduced the carnings of those that the minimum wage law intended to help. The minimum wage increase also led to shorter working weeks and increased use of part-time workers. Areccent study by Ernst and Young found that a 10% izcrease in real minimum wages decreases employment in sensitive industries or demographic groups by 1% to %. Indeed, the study points cut that when adult minimum wages in B.C. were increased trom $5.50 to $6 per hour in 1993, employment in the B.C. restaurant industry fell by 3%. Anti-poverty groups argue that higher minimunt wages increase a welfare recipient's incentive to work. The evi- dence, however, paints a dif- ferent picture. A 1995 study by Peter - Brandon of die University of Wisconsin found that increases in tninimum wages reduce labor force participation by single mothers wi ho receive welfare. All of this evidence sug- gests that minimum wage laws hurt the intended beneficia- ries, specifically, unskilled -workers and the youth. This is the real research record, and WESTCOAST ENERGY'S LIQUEFIED NATURAL GAS STORAGE F Active public consultation is the cornerstone of our project. But, these activities are only one part of our consultation process, From community meetings to individual conversations with focal residents, Westcoast Energy's proposed liquefied , natural gas (LNG) facility has been tested agazinst many public interests. Consu!tation activities in several Sunshine Coast and Howe Sound communities, including Secheit, Gibsons, _ Squamish and Lions Bay, have We are aiso undergoing a comprehensive review as required by the rigourous approval processes of the been invaluable in testing and shaping the plans for ovr proposed facility in the Sunshine Coast Regional District. We've met with community groups, First Nations, municipalities and all relevant authorities to seek their input and guidance. 2 _ Public involvement and Consuttation Sunshine Coast Regional District, the provincial Environmental Assessment Office and the B.C. Utilities Commissisn. We'd like to hear from vau. To tearn more about natural qas and our proposed project, contact us for more information: Douy Thorneycroft, Project Manayer call coliect (604) 691-5533 visit our website at www.wesicoastenergy.com/ing Gao Energy The second itt a series on Westcoast Fnergy's proposed liquefied natural gas facility. = Satety and Environment the evidence that should guide policy making in Alberta, Bridsh Columbia, and else- where in the country. — Fasil Mihlar ts a senior policy analyst at the Vancouver- based Fraser Institute. JACILITY £3 Jodustrial evelopment