Dear Editor: On behalf of approximately 7000 North Shore tennis players who were given the opportunity to play tennis in the Cap West Tennis Bubble over the past vear, and again this vear, we wish te thank Larco for teasing these premises to us tree of charge, Last year Larco offered) the North Vancouver Reereation Commission the use of the Cap West Reereation facilities which the company was closing. It was considered to be too casdy to upgrade and maintain ail the facilities, but the commission supported the North Shore Indoor ‘Tennis Centre Association’s (NSITCA) proposal to operate the tennis bubble at no cost to the taxpayer. The NSITCA signed a contract with the commission and Larco to operate the facility until May 1, 1998. on the Menu When a guest walks into Death By Chocolate, they are in for a dazzling experience of the senses. This upscale dessert restaurant is unmatched in it’s exemplary level of service and decor, As soon as a guest walks in they are presenced with an album containing 30 pictures of Death By Chocolate’s fabulous Wednesday. October 21. 1998 — North Shore News - 9 north shore news _ ss MAIL Box Larco thanked for use The pleasures of Village life of NV tennis facilities The need for a public faeility was demon- strated when it proved to be a financial success with nearly 700 people registered. When the lease expired, Larca once more dereed to a month-to-month extension of the lease, again at no charge. Fall operations started on Sept. 28, and by the first week of October more than 200 have aready registered. We hope to operate the bubble until the new permanent facility is built, which hopetul- Iv will be operational by May 1999. Thanks again to Larco and the recreation commission, Who have made it possible for so many people to play tennis indoors on the North Shore, where it dees rain once in awhile. Elmer Helm, President North Shore Indoor Tennis Centre Association October 23 " ence,” says franchisee, Satinder Parmar. In addition to it’s famous desserts, Death By Chocolate also has a full cappuccino bar featuring Seattle's Best Coffee, as well as a light lunch and dinner menu. They open carly in the morning offering coffee and fresh baked goods and remain open until midnight, specialty desserts. Once a selection is made, the guest is inviced to the center of the restaurant where they watch the dessert being prepared The eltinate for them. They use only the highest quality ingre- dients which includes Belgian Callebaur choc- olate. “It is a wonderful- ly unique dining experi- ‘ehecolate Sunday to Thursday, and 1AM, Friday — and Saturday. So stop in and experience the world of decadence! Dessert Destination. 130S Marine Drive (AT BRiOGMAN) re aed NortTH VANCOUVER ere oy Aenea ote ron B* EF) Dear Editor: What a pleasure it is to shop and drive in kdgemont Village Courtesy abounds. pedestrians are sate and ted white, m.p. never is heard a screech of brakes. Vhank vou all. Maisie Pinkerton North Vancouver advertonal, October 21/1998 OF SENATES AND PARLIAMENTS On October 19th Albertans went to the polis to elect two "Senators in Waiting", even though our Prime Minister has said that he will not appoint their selected representatives to the Upper House. Meanwhile, the 38 Senators elected by Australians some 16 days earlier went directly to their jobs without needing the approval of the Australian Prime Minister. This is but one of the major differences between the Australian and Canadian Parliamentary systems, both born of a common mother, but subsequently developing in remarkably different ways. ; SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES Canada and Australia are similar in that they are both large countries with relatively small "multicultural" populations concentrated in just a few major urban centers. We have in common a history of British colonialism, and both counties initially adopted the Westminster parliamentary model. The Australian Parliament however, has evolved and changed very quickly since its six original states formed a federation in 1901. Australians have already incorporated into their system a Triple-E Senate (elected, equal and effective), preferential balloting, elements of proportional representation, and compuisory voting. In addition, although the colour schemes. of Parliament and the Senate are the traditional green and red respectively, the term "House of Commons" has been replaced by "House of Representatives", and a horseshoe shaped seating plan has replaced the traditional arrangement of opposing government and opposition benches. The Australian House of Representatives is elected based on population, just as Members of Parliament are elected based on population in Canada. In Australia too, there are some enormous ridings, with one in Western Australia exceeding 2 million square kilometers in size. The average number of voters per riding, as for Canada, is about 80,000, but Australians must go to the polls no later than three years after the preceding election, compared to a maximum of five years in Canada. Senators in Australia are elected for six year terms, with half of the 76 Senate seats up for re-election every three years. However, a complete re-election of both the House of Representatives and the Senate can be triggered if the Senate twice rejects a Government Bill. ELECTING THE HOUSE Voting in federal elections is compulsory in Australia, so voter turnout is always much higher than the more or less 65% of eligible voters who take the time to go to the polls in Canada. The voting system is much more complex too, because a preferential ballot is used to elect the House of Representatives, while a proportional voting system is used to elect the Senate. Preferential ballots require voters not just to mark their candidate of choice, as huppens in Canada, but also to rank the remaining candidates in order of preference. During the subsequent counting of the ballots, if no candidate receives more than 50% of the total vote, the candidate receiving the least number of votes is dropped from the list and the second choices trom his or her ballots are applied to the vote totals for the temaining candidates. This process continues, each time dropping the candidate with the least number of votes, and applying the next level of voter preferences to the remaining candidates, until one of the candidates receives more than 50% of the vote. The winner may not be a particular voter's FIRST choice, but could easily be the SECOND choice. If preferential balloting had been used in Canada during the last election, it is more than likely that the outcome would have been quite different. This is because our "First Past The Post" system of electing MPs commonly produces winners with as little as 35% to 39% of the vote, and can also produce an entire Government, ike the present Liberal Government, with well under 40% of the popular vote. Preferential balloting, on the other hand, is designed to ensure that the successful candidates have received a soiid to moderate endorsement by more than 50% of the voters ELECTING THE SENATE A proportional voting system is used in Australia to elect six senators for each of ine six states, plus two for the territories. The minimum number of votes required for success is calculated using a complex formula based on the number of voters in each state and the number of candidates running. For example, if there are 800,CCO votes available in a state, and 12 candidates, the minimum vote required for election witi be 800,000 votes divided by (12+1)candidates +1 vote= 61,599 votes. Proportional voting for senators tends to favor greater representation in the Senate by smailer parties and independents, so the Government is usually forced to work for senatorial support for its legislation through negotiation and compromise. This suggests a truly effective senate, the exact opposite to our Prime Minister's "rubber stamp" style of Senate. Australia is clearly well ahead of us in terms of parliamentary reform, but Alberta has twice in recent times tried to force changes in the makeup of the Canadian Senate. That province's Stan Waters became Canada's first and only elected Senator when he was eventually appointed to the Upper House by former Prime Minister Brian Mulroney. Now we are waiting to see if Albevta can do it again, this time against the will of a Prime Minister who holds the recerd for patronage appointments to an unequal, unelected, and ineffective Senate. Ted White, M.P. , #302-1200 Lynn Valley Road, North Vancouver, B.C. V7} 2A2 ‘er ey eo Tel: 666.0585 Fax:-666-0509, Intesner: hitp://www.ceformca/white-t/ -)25 79 74