pStudy calls for jaction on local quality of life mGVRD grapples with land-use, (population pressures, livability PEOPLE ARE “tired of studies being an excuse for § lack of progress.”” By Martin Millerchip & Contributing Writer So says a discussion paper on land-use planning prepared by the Greater Vancouver Regional District (GVRD) and presented to North Vancouver District Council by Vancouver Mayor Gordon Campbell. The GVRD is re-evaluating, if fm not reinventing itself, and claims a me popular mandate: ‘People expect us to act quickly and positively to protect our quality of life.’ Campbell is in the midst of a concentrated series of visits to Me regional councils in his role as 7 GYRD chairman to promote con- tinued municipai interest and par- ticipation in collective action on planning issues. Campbell's discussion paper is the culmination of the GVRD’s Ongoing attempt to grapple with the Lower Mainland’s exploding population growth and the wishes of residents to protect ‘‘livabili- ty.’ As the paper notes, the Lower Mainland presents the challenge of being the fastest growing metro- politan region in Canada with the most limited land base of any metropolitan area in North America. Complicating ati planning issues are: @ the ecological and economic importance of the Fraser River; @ the best agricultural land in Canada; athe importance of the Pacific Flyway for migratory birds. The GVRD began a vear of research, discussion and public consultation on regional planning issues in 1989 culminating with the adoption in July 1990 of a policy paper entitled Creating Our Future: Steps To A More Livable Region. The 54 steps were then cir- culated to the member municipalities for comment. The comments were not always kind. Surrey’s director of planning and development services, Johnny Carline, noted the ‘‘jurisdictional uncertainty and ambiguous pur- pose’’ of the document. ‘*Many of the actions are con- versational (e.g. conferences), paper tigers (¢.g. creating goals) acd encouragement to others to act. As understandable as this may be, the preponderance of these ‘pseudo-actions’ weigh the document down. **When all is said and done, it seems there will be a lot more said than done,” Carline said. But Carline zeroed in on the issue of an ‘turban containment policy, establishing a greenline beyond which development is not allowed” as having ‘‘substance.’’ Campbell told district council in his Nov. 4 presentation that the greenline concept grew out of a decision to approach land-use planning ‘from a different direc- tion. “*