GVRD REPORT RELEASED Second Narrows Bridge widening takes top priority THE GREATER Vancouver’s Transportation Task Force has identified $135 million in North Shore highway im- provement projects as having high priority in improving area transportation over the next six years. Released at a Wednesday morn- ing Greater Vancouver Regional District development services committee meeting, the task force’s summary report also recommended several B.C. Transit improvements for the North Shore, but made only passing ref- erence to the Lions Gate Bridge and a third crossing of Burrard In- et. Overall, the report estimated that $2 bilion.will be needed to WEST Vancouver Mayor Don Lanskail . maintain transportation in the Greater Vancouver region over the next [0 years, and it recommend- ed increased fuel and vehicle licei- sing levies and a better share of provincial government revenue as ..the primary: means of ‘raising the . needed funds for the region. “The “cost of projects already :eommitted for construction by the province such as the Highway ! in- terchanges at..Lonsdale Avenue and Westview Drive were not in- cluded in the $2 viliion total. . At.the top of the report’s list was a recommendation to begin planning next year on a $55 million ‘project to widen Second Narrows Bridge from six to eight lanes. - A-compaaion $20 million pro- | ject to. widen the Second Narrows ‘north:end access from Keith Road to the bridge and improve inter- changes and access. roads between Lynn Creek and the Second Nar- rows was also given top priority. The high priority for both pro- jects is based, in past, oa the booming residential development . “and the projected - population ‘growth in North Vancouver District’s Seymour area, which is expected to-jump from 20,000 to J NORTH Vancouver District between: 45,000 and 50,020 over _ the next 20 years. . A 1991 start on planning for projects to extend the North Shore’s Low Level road link from Main Street in North Vancouver to west of Park Royal in West Van-. couver. was also recommended. The link, according to the report, ’ is vital for improving commercial transportation to the North Shore's waterfront industries. Total cost of the three suggested Low Level extensions was estimated at $55 million. The GYRD report is part of the provincial goverament’s overall review of B.C.’s transportation system, which directed the pro- vince’s eight economic develop- ment regions to submit in-depth transportation studies of their areas, establish regional transpor- tation strategies and identify prior- ity transportation projects. North Shore projects evaluated in the report included a third crossing of Burrard Iniet and widening of Lions Gate Bridge, but neither were included in the final recommendations. West Vancouver Mayor Don By TIMOTHY RENSHAW News Reporter Lanskail, who is also the chairman of the Vancouver Regional Transit Commission, said that though he was pleased with the report’s em- phasis on transit, he was concerned that no recommendations about the Lions Gate Bridge had been contained in the summary report. ‘It has to be dealt with,’’ he said. ‘It’s one of the transporta- tion issues in the Lower Mainland, particulasly for the North Shore. There has got to be a definite response to it.’” A recent engineering report on the bridge commissioned by tiie provincial government from North Vancouve’s Buckland and Taylor Ltd. stated that Lions Gate was structurally sound, but its traffic lanes were toc narrow and _ its sidewalks too narrow and too close to bridge traffic. It recommended redecking the bridge with wider lanes and traffic barriers to protect pedestrians and cyclists or transforming it to a cable-stayed bridge with a fourth lane as the two best overhaul op- ticns for the bridge. The third option outlined by Buckland and Taylor was to build a new bridge, ‘‘in which case First Narrows may not be the best place for it.” But no subsequent provincial government: decision. has been made on Lions Gate Bridge renovations. . North Shore wansit projects recommended in the GVRD report as part of the overall GVRD tran- sit network improvement package to the year 2001 included adding another SeaBus to the current two-vessel fleet, providing park Mayor Marityn Baker . and ride facilities at both the Phibbs and Capilano and Marine Drive exchanges, and upgrading bus service on routes to the SeaBus terminal and Phibbs exchange. North Vancouver District Mayor Marilyn Baker said she was pleased with the recommendation for a third SeaBus, but was concerned that, overall, ‘‘1 don’t see a lot of transit improvement for the North Shore.” Subsequent North Shore road improvements from the years 1997 to 2001 included widening High- way 1 frum four to six lanes be- tween Lynn Creek and Capilano River and constructing a new con- necting road from Lions Gate Bridge to the highway. Improving the Sea-to-Sky Highway between Horseshoe Bay and Lillooet via Squamish was also recommended. : The report has been distributed to ail councils for discussion. Comments will be heard at a July 26 GVRD board meeting. 3 - Friday, July 14, 1989 - North Shore News soli photo Tom Burley MEMBERS OF the Citizen’s Action Group of Lower Lonsdale demonstraied outside North Vancouver City Hall on Monday night to protest building heights in the community. A policy meeting was scheduled to discuss updates in the city’s view study. VIEW STUDY SUBMITTED TO COUNCIL | Crowd cheers, jeers at City meeting on height restrictions PICKET SIGNS telling passing motorists to fight against highrises in Lower Lonsdale set the mood for Monday night’s North Vancouver City policy meeting set to discuss updates in the city’s view study. And inside council chambers, ci- ty residents flowed out the doors and into the hall, hooting, cheering and clapping as speakers rose to give their presentations. Residents were responding to ci- ty staff's newest propesal to cut zoning heights to one-third of limits suggested by city consultant Aitken Wreglesworth, with pro- posed heights along Lower Lons- dale ranging between twenty-five to forty feet (roughly two to four storeys), and heights along blocks east and west of Lower Lonsdale ranging between forty and sixty feet (roughly four to six storeys). But city staff also talked about instituting higher limits in the Of- ficial Community Plan (OCP) to encourage limited highrise devei- opment aleng city guidelines. OCP fevels could range between forty to 150 feet (roughly four to 15 storeys) in the areas along and just east and west of Lower Lonsdale. City planner Richard White said it is necessary to mainiain a dif- ference between the zoning heights and the OCP heights in order to put the decision making power in the hands of the city. Under the ci- ty’s proposal, developers would have to make rezoning applications to the city if they wished to take advantage of the taller OCP height limits. But despite the lower heights proposed by city staff, several of By CORINNE BJORGE Contributing Writer the speakers said they believed the city was concentrating too much on further urbanization, and the wishes of the developers. Currently, the zoning is unlimi- ted in Lower Lonsdale, although the OCP suggests a six-storey height limit. “Developers don’t live here,’’ said city resident Dora Osborne. “Send them (lawyers and devel- opers) back a strong letter to tell them to keep their nose out of this,’’ said resident Bob Tarplett. The Citizen’s Action Group of Lower Lonsdale (CAGILL) said they did not want any new highrises to be built, and that the city should consider other, possibly more “‘creative,’’ alternatives. : Dennis Smit brought forward a CAGILL suggestion to have tiered, six-storey buildings developed throughout Lower Lonsdale. But city staff said the tiered buildings. created as much view biockage, and threw more shadows on the development site than spac- ed highrises would. Helen Millard of CAGILL said the city should clear up confusion by building a scale model of its proposals, and then hold a refer- endum to determine city reaction. *“(Confusion) comes in part from our lack of expertise and un- HEU ratifies contract From page 1 campaign since their union’s negotiators reached the tentative agreement June 26. LGH president Robert Smith said the BCNU vote was ‘‘a real message of confusion’’ and a vote of non-confidence in the union’s executive, but added that it pro- vided an opportunity to reopen discussion on issues nurses feel were not addressed in the tentative agreement. Wednesday’s BCNU rejection of its tentative deal follows ratifica- tion Tuesday by the 25,000 member Hospital Empfoyees Union (HEU) of its contract with the HLRA. While HEU members at LGH voted 53.1 per cent to reject the contract, province-wide, HEU members voted 70 per cent in favor of the two-year deal that will in- crease the average member wage of $12 by 13.85 per cent over this year and next. Neil Anderson, HEU repre- sentative at LGH, said member- ship at the hospital had run counter to the provincial average because such major items as the practical nursing issue and con- tracting out were not addressed in the contract. The tentative agreements ended a 17-day strike at LGH and other B.C. health facilities on June 30. derstanding,”’ she said. But city staff members had earlier dismissed a scale model because of cost, and because they said drawings and photographs were better for representing view impacts than models. Ald. Rod Clark said it would de possible for the city to hold a ref- erendum, but that it would have to be city-wide and take into account the views of ali city residents, not just those in Lower Lonsdale. Millard said whether it was held throughout the city, or only in Lower Lonsdale, residents should be given an opportunity to vote. “This is our community; we are the electorate; council should know definitely what we want,’’ she said. Although city staff's pres- entation . centered around view considerations, Millard said most of CAGILL’s members are con- cerned about the preservation of the Lower Lonsdale neighborhood. “Qur major concern is about the quality of life,’’ said Millard. “(Jrbanization is a term we've been hearing more frequently from city staff,’’ she said. Resident Ivan Ekin said he was concerned that highrises being built forced current tenants from their accommedations. ‘Throwing people out who have lived and worked there (in Lower Lonsdale) their whole lives is absolute nonsense,’’ he said. City council will continue to hear presentations from the public at a meeting to be held next Mon- day at 7 p.m. at city hall. Aute.. 12224 Classifias Ads...... Editoria! Page.......... 6 Home & iiavden.... Mailbox ............... What's fioing Qn... Seccat Cinss Registration Nember 3885