fone a peeinees eee - >> out, without anyone -won-. “| cof. da’s. important. trade: figures’ : his lead. “Wherever + practical, our future reports and articles will stick with the measurements we think most people prefer: feet, miles, acres, pounds and gallons. | We also. think it’s the least we can ‘do for our non-metric neighbors to the south who buy 76% of all our exports and are vital to our tourist trade. Let's hear what YOU think. sunday news north’shore news NEWS - ADVERTISING 980-0511 1139 Lonsdale Ave., «-- North Vancouver, B.C. V7M 2H4 (604) 980-0511 CLASSIFIED 986-8222 CIRCULATION 986-1337 Peter Speck Publisher Associate Publisher Edltor-in-Chiet Advertising Director Ro! aham Noel Wright Eric Cerdwell Classified Manager Production & Office Administrator Tim Francis Bem Hillard Faye McCrae Managing Editor Newa Editor Photograph Anayrraser ‘Chie Lloye, —_ Ellawort Dtekon Display Administrator Accounting Supervisor na Champion Barbara Keon North Shore News, founded in 1969 as an independent communi- y new epaper an d qualified under Schedule itl, Part ill, Paragrapt fil of Excised Tax Act, is published each Wednesday and Sunday, by North Shore Free Presa Lid. and distributed to every door on the Narth Shore. Second Clase Mall Registration Number 3885. Subscriptions $20 per year, Entire contenta © 1979 North Shore Free Press Lid. Ai righta reserved, VERIFIED CIRCULA a aan Ea SN (GH) THIS PAPER IS REGYCLABLE dering - whether they make “3 ; any common Senses *Recently, _Statscan had beed missing from Cana- the species still around); you’ (ans goin a lot of unpaid community. work: again: next year * — a total, in fact, of 137 days. It- will ‘be May 17, 1980,. before you're able to earn”a.cent for. “yourself, your mate and those little pattering feet. That's the thought- provoking news just brought to us by the Fraser Institute of Vancouver, a_ highly respected independent research body whose life's ~ work is to watch what the tax collector is doing to us. Its latest dismal findings are contained in a new booklet called Tax Facts. The booklet shows that the three levels of govern- ment under which we suffer are winning the race for our hard-earned - dollars at. an alarming speed. “$n 1978 the average family income was $20,000, out of which federal, provincial and municipal tax collectors grabbed $7,486 — or 37.4%. Seventeen years earlier, in 1961, the average family income ws $5,500 and the total tax bill $1,863. TAX INDEX The Fraser Institute measures this increase as a “consumer tax index” which works out, from 196) —— through 1978, at 302%. During the same period the official consumer price index rose by only 134%. Put another way, the percen- tage cost increased by much more than double the rise in the cost of living. And oddly cnough, in- come tax was not the main culprit. Taxes other than income tax accounted for nearly 60% of the average 1978 family's tax burden of $7,486, which broke down as follows: Income tax, $3,134; sales taxes, $1,107; taxes for social security, pension, medical and hospital ser- of government ~ vices, $1,195; © liquor, tobacco, entertainment and other - excise taxes, $384; auto, fuel and vehicle licence taxes, $371; profits tax, $312; property tax, $304; natural resources taxes, $204; import duties, $268; other miscellaneous taxes, $207. All this, of course, is hardly surprising when you consider the personal impact of the millions and billions all three levels of govern- ment merrily spend week by week and month by month in the taxpayer's name. For .example, every 41 billion spent by Ottawa (they currently spend over $50 billion a year) costs every man, woman, child and baby in Canada an average of $40. If you reckon an “average family” as consisting today of two parents and two children, that’s $160 per family per federal billion. FOOD AND SHELTER At the provincial level, every $100 million spent by the B.C. government takes $172 from that same family's pocketbook. And on the North Shore every $1 million splurged by your local council or school board relieves the North Van District family of $68; the West Van family of $104; and, the North Van City family of $124. These hard facts and figures may not make you: very happy. But at least they may help you read yester- day's federal budget — and the provincial and municipal budgets coming your way next year — with a keener, more critical eye, . As the authors of the Fraser Institute’s booklet note’ “The consumer tax index has risen more sharply over the period (1961-78) .., than any of the other economic burdens that the family faces, account for a more signifi- cant chunk of the = con- sumer’s budget than shelter and food combined — a complete reversal from 1961.” Shelter and food—“are essential to life itself, Put very bluntly, therefore, we have now, it seems, reached the almost incredible stage where we are compelled to | give our elected representa- tives more to squander from one election to the next than we spend on our own basic | survival. In the case of the federal government over the past decade “squander” ‘is the only appropriate word. OUT OF THE GLUE During the Trudeau years Ottawa not only spent every cent it extracted from us, After cight deficit budgets out of 10 it also landed us in hock to the tune of over $11 current level of taxes. _ We. ‘may spare. a teary i passing, for Prime Minister Clark and his. colleagues, struggling to find. some way of getting Canada out of the, glue they've inherited from their predecessors. But in the end it’s up to us —- and we have only two basic . choices. One is to carry on as at present, grumbling futilely, in which case the taxman will undoubtedly dig his ‘ hand ever deeper into our pockets. The other --— regardless of any threatened cuts in so- called “services” — is to let all governments know, loud and clear, that we're no longer prepared to work for them five months a year. Especially when it means giving themt more money “Total outlays on: taxes - than we spend on feeding ourselves and keeping a roof over our heads. Our American cousins made such a choice 206 years ago this month in the harbor at Boston. Maybe it's’ time to consider a Tea Party. of our own, 1979 International Year of the Chile