6 ~ Wednesday, August 27, 1986 - North Shore News News Viewpoint Emergency airlift ritish Columbia doesn’t have its own medically equipped air ambulance, That fact may nol alarm you unless one of your relatives or friends has been involved in an acci- dent or is in need of medical treatment and time is of the essence. The provincial government ciaims it doesn’t need to buy its own helicopter because the Lower Mainland has a thorough road ambulance network. Officials from the government’s Emergency Health Services say if a helicopter is needed one can be chartered. But not all commercial helicopters are medically equipped, and the availability of the appropriate coramercial craft is not guaranteed. Specialists ia the field say air ambulances are needed when a ground ambulance would take 15 minutes or more between transporting a trauma victim from the scene to treatment at a major trauma centre. If this is the case a medical helicopter based in Van- couver would have a great role to play, especially in the evacuation of trauma victims from such places as the North Shore’s isolated wooded areas. Also the helicopter could be called upon in the event of a disaster, such as an earthquake. For instance, in Los Angeles 26 helicopters would be ready to assess earthquake damages. Vancouver has none. isn’t it about time that situation was improved? Post Office messa HERE we go again. There are unpleasant noises emerging from Ottawa about the post office. Specifically, Michel Coté, the minister responsible for Canada Post, says the bloated Crown cor- poration is considering cutting back mail delivery to every third day. That’s good news only if you’rea courier company. To the rest of us, it’s another warning that those in charge of the post office still haven't come to grips with the root problems. The purpose of the service cutback is to meet a target to eliminate the postal deficit by March 31, 1988, a target set up by Finance Minister Michael Wilson in his February budget. Coté said every-third-day delivery is only one of a number of options | By Tony Carlson | being considered as the post office Prepares a new business plan. But watch out. Their last business plan had the post office using sub- sidized buildings to sell products that have nothing to do with the mail, in direct competition with local business people who help to support the postal money pit with their tax dollars. The last business plan had the post office reducing the deficit in other ways too. You remember those postage increases, don’t you? Why it seems like just five years ago or so that a stamp cost a paltry 17 cents. BUTTING OUT THE FREE ENTERPRISE WAY — 1 Let business decide on smok CIGARETTE SMOKERS are now an endangered species. No smoking zones have been established in hospitals, office buildings, recreational! centres, shop: ping malls, and other places of public congregation. Cities and municipalities from coast to coast have amended their health by-laws so as to further proscribe the limits within which smoking is still allow- ed. In many cases, outright bans have been imposed. Tobacco product advertising has long been severely limited, and there are now calls from otherwise respec- table quarters, for its outright elimination. Federal Health and Welfare Minister Jake Epp has even gone so far as to suggest that is government would soon prohibit smoking on a country-wide basis. The reason for this spate of activi- ty is not hard to discern. Smoking has long been regarded as harmful to those who indulge themselves in this habit. But recent medical By WALTER BLOCK Fraser Institute, Vancouver evidence would now appear to in- dicate that people who inhabit the same (enclosed) rooms as do the smokers are also endangered by the secondary effects of this practice. it may be rather hypocritical for a government which still subsidizes tobacco growers to climb onto the anti-smoking bandwagon, and even attempt to lead the parade, but in the furor to wipe out this ‘vile’? habit, logical consistency has been one of the first victims. There are basically two ways to solve the problem of smoking. One is by government fiat, and the second is by allowing the institutions of the free enterprise system to deal with the problem. Unfortunately, the political leaders of our society are so philosophically rccustomed to using THE VOICE OF NORTH AND WEST VANCOUVER ae ety SUNDAY + WEDNESDAY - F Dav 1139 Lonscale Ave. North Vancouver, B.C. V7M 2H4 57,656 (avetage Nednesduy Fosay B® Suncinps Sure it’s a tough job running an organization that must serve such a huge, underpopulated country. But why is the government even looking at cutting back service when there are gaping holes in the produc- tivity picture which could profitably be closed. And what about Canada Post's new management? Do they honest- ly believe that the way to salvage a service-based business is to cut back on service? legislation as a bludgeon fer all dif- ficulties, that the second type of solu- tion has never even been publicly contemplated. Indeed, it is no exaggcration to say that most peo- ple have never even heard of it. How, then, would the market deal with the problem of smoking? Although it is always risky to an- ticipate the workings of a free marketplace, one scenario would have each business firm deciding for itself whether or not to impose a smoking ban, and if so, of what type. Some might allow smoking in all areas, at all times. Others might set aside special zones, which might vary with the time of day or day of the week. Still others might be temp- ted to deal with the problein in ways that are not yet known. Given this panoply of different smoking rules at different establish- ments, customers would then sort themselves out accordingly. They would patronize those which pleas- PSR Cae NGEL WRIGHT - ” ON VACATION ~ Display Advertising 980-0511 Classified Advertising 986-6222 Newsroom 985-2131 Distribution 986-1337 Subscriptions WELL GVE'EM ANOTHER FEY DANS ......TH HEAD SOUR... Where is the discussion of ways to cut absenteeism among postal workers which runs double the na- tional average for private sector employces in comparable jobs? Where is the managemen! agenda for a more sensible approach to us- ing part-time and casual labor, in- stead of being cowed by union demands that push the overtime bills into the stratosphere? Is it being too cynical to think that ” ed them most, and by so doing, they would reward and penalize the business concerns imposing them. Firms, in other words, would now compete with one another not only with regard to their primary good or service (restaurant, department store, etc.) but also as pertains to the smoking rules they have set up. And the same analysis applies to the work place. There would be an “invisible hand”’ in operation here, too, guiding employers t< set up smoking rules which would best suit their respective employees. How would this work? Let us suppose that a given in- dustry is composed of people who are avid anti-smokers. Allowing this practice to take place cn the factory premises, even in small and strictly limited areas, would thus be for them a strong negative non-pecuniary ef- fect; it would be equivalent to impos- ing upon them any other undesirable working condition. Publisher: Editor-in-Chief Managing Editor Advertising Director Entre contents * : 1986 North Shore Free Press Ltd All woes Fights reserved ie all too familiar this idea of every-third-day delivery is a trial balloon — albeit a lead one — aimed at softening up the public so that when five-day-week service is retained we'll all be filled with gratitude? Let's hope not. Let’s hope the postal heavy thinkers come up with more ideas such as franchising postal stations, another option apparently being kicked around now, but one that has some potential. Let’s hope Canada Post manage- ment listens to the recommendations of the private sector task force which studied the operation last year — and maybe even gets tougher than the task force in dealing with this na- tional embarrassment. Let's hope. But don’t hold your breath. ing bans In such a case, the workers would be more likely than otherwise to quit and take jobs elsewhere. They would only maintain their former high at- tachment to their present employer if compensated for this — by higher pecuniary wages. In such circum- stances, it would clearly be to the in- teres: of the firm to prohibit smok- ing throughout the premises. Now consider a business concern which employs people who are quite oblivious to the dangers of smoking. A ban on the practice in this case would be viewed as an undesirable working condition, just the opposite of its interpretation in the previous example. Here, the forces of the market would work in the direction of allowing the widest range for smoking. Otherwise, t'1e employees would be attracted elsewhere, to places that better cateicd to their habit. (To be continued Sunday.) Peter Speck Noel Wright Barrett Fisher