WEDNESDAY November 1, 1995 ‘Weather | Thutsday: Maint, sunsy High YC, low -2C. Ste RY Arka SEE ET ee = 8, re ety te: S RS SARE @ Around Town............20 B Susiness svseeeeee DB @ Classifieds......42 B Collins... @ Crossword. B Fashion... BS r" PMSIQGHtS es eesscsnsnsececeein & Mailbox... HN. Shore Alert..........8 Guest Appsarances.39 BW Sport... ecco 16 a Table Hoppiny............22 @ TV Listingg..............40 & WHIQHE..ncnennennnen Sipping Sonoma at the wine fest: 25 Table Hopping . restaurant news: 22 arts i When We Were Singing arn unexpected gem: 19 @ Around town listing of events: 20 Hog Town FOR THE second time in a month an overflow crowd jammed North Vancouver District hall to debate con- troversial land-use decisions in the Seymour area. NORTH VANCOUVER DISTRICT COUNCIL By Martin Millerchip This time the issue was the rezoning of water- front property ta allow the development of Cates Landing. and the debate was just as intense as that surrounding the proposed development of Cave and Mounttin forests. United Properties Ltd. have been attempting since 1992 te redevelup the lands owned) by Noble ‘Towing and MeKenzie Barge and Marineways focated between 3795 and 3919 Dollarton Highway. But council phiced United's proposal for the site on hold hist year and crewed the Waterfront Task Fores (WTP) to develop long-term phianing clives fer the Dollanon/Deep Cove water Rarer aNics NEWS photo Mike Wakofield A 500-PERSON funeral for a West Vancouver man on Friday drew Harley Davidson motor- cycle aticionados from al! over the Lower Mainland. See story on page 3. Speakers split on waterfront condo plan The task force presented its report in June. While not specifically favoring a parks designa- tion for Cates Landing, the report recommended against medium- 2nd high-density residential development on the waterfront, Speakers at ‘Tuesday night's hearing were evenly divided for and against United's proposal to build 179 condominiums on the site. Proponents argued that the development would provide park, waterfront access, fishing piers and a walkway to Cates Park on polluted industrial land that would be too expensive for council 10 acquire as parkland. But opponents were furious that council wis even considering the proposal before a review af the Seymour Official Community Plan (OCP) and against the recommendations of its own WTE. They argued that the seale of the proposed development was “just too big” Doilarton resident Rebecca Syablom asked what the point oF an OCP was “if itis thrown out of the window every time seme speculater or developer comes along wath another proposal” “Tow can you waste so much maney and se much of other people's Gime. congratulating them on the one hand and igneriag ther on the other?” said Sjoblom. But United Properties vice-president Roger Moors described his company’s plan for Cates landing as one that “will benefit the whole com- munity of North Vancouver.” Moors offered council three alternatives: “Continue with the existing zoning. The con- sequence is no park untess the district buys il, no public access to waterfront, no cleanup and con- tinual uncertainty about the long-term industrial use that may be made of the property. “Buy the property and place the burden for their purchases on the community. ® “Allow the proposed rezoning and acquire the must valuable park and waterfront portion of the property for the community at no cost” But others asked why there only had to be three choices for the property. One speaker sup- gested a restaurant and: paid parking lot would alow for veaterfront access and site clean up. Several speakers told counci} that lost iadus- trial land and the ship-buitding industry could not be rephiced. With at feast 25 speakers waiting to be heard al {Eo pam. Mayor Murray Dykenan was forced to adjourn the public hearing to Now 15.