sai) Canada’s Numb | Suburian Newsp: Circulation 986-1337 60 pages 25 eS WEWS photo ferry Peters f2y fed ba oe * senool PAGE 11 ad a 0 0 0 © = 7) 3 a = o. BUT PRESS COUNCIL CENSURES NS NEWS A READER’S COMPLAINT that columnist Doug Collins’ ‘‘real interest is to incite racial hatred’’ has been disinissed by the B.C. Press Council. At the same time, the Council has upheld two other aspects of the complaint against Collins and the North Shore News. The complaint was in- vestigated, with all parties present, at a closed hearing held by the Council on March 24. The full text of the Coun- cil’s ruling, announced Wednesday, is as follows: “A complaint against the North Shore News involving columnist Doug Collins and a book banned in Canada has been partially opt: d by the B.C. Press Council. “In a column last August 29, Collins opposed the ban- ning of the book, The Hoax of the Twentieth Century, by an American professor, A.R. Butz, which claims the Holocaust was a hoax and that the Nazis did not kill six million Jews in the Second World War. ‘The column prompted an exchange between Collins and Dr. Philip Pinkus of West Vancouver, a professor BABY Corey, and the Friday News he holds are both celebrating their first year. This third edi- tion of the North Shore News allows us to cover more completely the area we serve. Read the com- plete story on the first year of the Friday News on page 3. of English at the University of B.C., who protested Col- lins’ treatracnt of the issue. One of Dr. Pinkus’ letters was reproduced in a subse- quent Collins column and another was published as a letter to the editor. “Dr. Pinkus complained to the Press Council at a hearing that Collins lent credence to the Butz book by indicating it presented material about the Holocaust that should be considered seriously. He said people didn’t see it as simply a col- umn oun book banning. He pointed out that the headline on the column, How big WAS the Holocaust? was not about book banning. “Dr. Pinkus said that in one of his columns, Collins had accused him of being a book banner, comparing him with Hitler, and that he had no opportunity to refute the accusation because the paper cut off debate on the issue. He declared he did not believe in banning books. “Noel Wright, editoz-in- See page 8