14 ~ Wednesday, July 14, 1993 ~ North Shore News Taxpayers want GV protect region’s livability Report summarizes Creating Our Future forums SEVENTY-SEVEN per cent of participants in the Greater Vancouver Regional District’s Creating Our Future: Critical Choices public consultation program support paying an average of $104 per $100,000 of current assessed residential value to implement the GVRD long-range financial plan. Another 57% support paying an average of $150 per $100,000 of residential assessed value, and 31% support paying $190 or more. - These findings are-included in a 46-page report received by the GVRD board recently, which summarizes public input gathered during the Creating Our Future: Critical Choices public consulta- tion program held in May. ‘Input was gathered during a _ series of six simultaneous’ public - throughout the. ‘meetings held’ ‘region,. and. through a .16-page ' newspaper insert outlining the ma- jor GVRD ‘programs and their tax: Approximately .2,C00° impacts. people participated Girectly in the consultation. alot The public input. will: assist “the " -GVRD. board in- ‘making decisions ‘about: costs.:and : priorities for a. -long-range “financial . plan for. air" quality,” drinking < water ‘quality, -* ‘solid | waste, liquid waste, growth “management . and’ transportation, ~ regional parks and hospitals. The: long-range plan comprises . ‘major projects that--would cost $2.8 billion between 1992 and the 7 _< year. 2000. Provincial. government ‘. grants could reduce the local tax- payers’ bill to $1.5 billion. If the plan is fully implemented, . the tax"impact.on a single-family .-home assessed at $250,000 would “rise from $260 in 1993. to $475 by the year 2000. ‘The report shows that 61% of participants want more emphasis : “on air quality programs and: 54% want more emphasis.on- programs to improve drinking water quality. '* Forty-three per’ cent. of partici- pants. support. the proposed long-. range’ hospital’. program, — while . 48%. want more’ emphasis ‘on liq- “wid waste, | regional Parks and ~ solid waste programs, *' ‘ Other <. findings - in. the report . ° _show that:. : @.89% of ‘the participants sup-. ‘port or strongly support a Green Zone, including park land and the protection of. agricultural. lands . from, urban .'development. « Fifty- : . three per. cent support. $mailer ‘res- idential’ building lots to! make the | ‘best .use ‘of: land’ and “maximize * - open space. ®@ 54%: of participants. are willing, to: ‘live’ in higher density’ com- ‘ munities to ‘maintain the: quality of life in the region.” 4! @:80% * of participants | support ~ - voluntary trip ‘reduction , programs ‘to reduce vehicle use and 73% are willing to reduce their use of the .- automobile: to. decrease’ air: pellu- . tion and reduce traffic congestion.’ - @.. When asked how regional park “tax dollars should be spent, 71% of ‘participants ‘ identified buying ’ key park lands as the highest pri” ority, 69% identified protecting natural habitats and 54% iden- tified ‘providing basic park facili- ties. ®@ Participants generally support higher. levels of hospital services and higher taxes to pay for these services.’ However, participants: have “concerns abeut the role of the GVRD in health care, and many suggested: that..this. should be a provincial responsibility and not a -GVRD priority. ~ @ When asked to choose between ~ two options for improving drink- ing water quality, 33% of partici- pants did not know or preferred some other solution. @ The majority of participants (77%) agree that there should be a fee for garbage collection based on the quantity of garbage set out. Many participants support user fees or garbage collection fees as an incentive to reduce waste pro- duced, and to offset rising costs. If new disposal options are need- ed, 59% support incineration compared to 21% for landfill; © The majority (66%) of partici- ‘Education. Department, pants support implementing the tegion’s complete liquid waste management plan over the next eight years. Only 14% expressed low or no support for the pro- gram, estimated to cost nearly $1.1 billion. ; The majority of participants (58%) identified secondary treat- ment as a high priority. Copies of the Critical Choices consultation summary report are available free of charge from the GVRD Communications and 19th floor, 4330 Kingsway, Burnaby. FAS-T COLLISION REPAIRS QvHElg, FREE COURTESY CARS QUALITY WORKMANSHIP PRECISION REPAIRS SATISFACTION GUARANTEED TRREE ESTIMATES & 2428. INFORMATION CONSULTATION 298.3000 Behind every ‘ship that moves through 6 our “port i is'a sophisticated network that makes each voyage possible. Tug and barge companies, rail; truck, and - bus lines, terminal.operators, longshore workers and freight forwarders - working i in unison to © keep goods moving fo and from the port. The: Port of Vancouver i is proud to be a part of this: modem, ‘efficient and cost effective transportation system - keeping Canadian’ trade competitive throughout the world. | "Cariada’ s Front Door On The Pacific". A message frorn the Vancouver Pott Corporation