Unravell Minutes show genesis of ferry problems Robert Gaister News Reparter vobert@usnews.com AS the first of three fast ferries limps through its final set of sea trials, additional light has been shed on the wildly over- budget and chronically delayed project. Last week, the ferry corpo- ration released minutes of its board meetings which show the projeer has been off course tor some time. As far back as 1996, members of the first board oof directors of Caramaran Ferries International cCEL) che entin charged with building three fist ferries, were questioning evervthing from ambiguous cost estimates to contusion over the boards responsibili- ties. But their questions fell on deaf cars. ane the directors eventually resigned. They were succeeded) on the CFT board ty members of the parent BC Ferry Corp. board. Jack Munro was named the new CFI board chairman. The aew board asked rar fewer quesaons than its predecessor and the project rolled or, Weeding: Ainds. Costs for the three-ferry project had alreacy. escalated from the orig $210 million to $2*3 million and Jaunch dates had been repeatedly bieeen, CFE responded bv hiring the Pace Group media relations company yo help oftet the growing amount of negative publicity surrounding the pro- ject. A representative of the company addressed the hoqrd’s Feb. 19, 1998. meenng. “The job of a publicist is to find stories to pitch to the media — nor react te niedia stories,” the Pace Grev’s representative is recorded ins the Meeting’s minutes .7 stating, This goal wee surther outlined Curing the board’s March 19, 1998, ive when it was A month jater, a company representative is recorded as saying, “the media coverage is moving away front ‘time and money” topics and becoming much more positive.” During a Sept. 30, 1998, meeting, the board chairman considered the company’s work a fair accompli. “Jack Munro applauded the work done by the Pace Group and the resulting positive media cov- erage. He requested that CFI continue to use these publicists in the future.” Meanwhile, a cost-plus formula agreed upon with shipyards participating in the construction of the fast-sinking project was continuing to wreak havoc with the project's books. Eventually the for- mula. which guaranteed shipyards a profit over and above their construction costs, set off an avalanche of “time and money” stories that proved all but impossible for any public relations firm to counter- act. Below is a look at the events that led to the fast ferry fiasco which has seen the project’s costs bal- loon to $455 million. In 1996, BC Ferries president Frank Rhodes welcomed the new directors of Catamaran Ferries International, a wholly owned subsidiary of BC Ferries set up to construct three fast ferries vessels for its parent corporation. Rhodes told the new directors he supported the fast ferry program and that the BC Ferries board had approved $232 mil- lion to build three ships and an assembly building. According to minutes of the July 3 meeting, Sunday. March 14, 1999 - North Shore News - 3 Rhodes wanted “the CFE board to tunetion asa commercial board, supervising management, exer: cising due diligence over its programs and initia- dives and driving it to folfllment of its mandate.” A short time dater the board named Luce fohnstone ay its chairman. For the next several months fohnstone and we of her fellow independent directors tried to obtain information as per Rhodes’ initial direction. For example, CFIS directors: conehuued the project, would be berter off if the board saw a strategic busiaess plan. This was first put to CFI and BOFC management on Oct. 31, 1996. But the request proved difficult to fulfil because a busi- ness plan bad never been completed. “The Chair (Johnstone) asked that manage: ment identify for the Board the person responsible for development of a Strategic Business Plan and the date the plan will be presented for review,” stated the minutes of that early meeting. Nearly a month later, on Nov. 28, 1996, there was nothing new on the plan. During the board's nexe meeting, held on Dee. 12, 1996, BC Ferries CEO Tom Ward gave diree- tors copies of “Outline of the Process Required to Develop a Corporate Strategic Plan.” The docu- ment, said Ward, was to be used as a basis for the business plan originally sought by board members. Ward also proposed that Oksana Exell, who was and continues to be charged with marketing CFI around the world, head up the process of putting together the much sought after plan. During a Nov. 22, 1996, meczing, Ward was asked abour the need for a direct reporting struc- ture between che board and CFI management that included managers answering co the board. Ward replied thar Andrew Hamilton was responsible for CFI’s day-to-day operations, “a task thar would be difficult for the Board to manage.” Later during the Nov. 22 meeting, “the Chair commented that at this time the Board felt no ownership of the project.” And also during the same meeting, an uniden- tified board member asked, “Is the CFI board required? There is nothing for it to manage.” Meanwhile, projected budget overruns contin- ued to worry the board members. The rising costs were being blamed, in large part, on the sub-par performance of Vancouver Shipyards which was responsible for 70% of the fast ferry construction. “The Board was very perturbed by the report REWS photo Paul McGrath / inset) Terry Peters THE Pacificat fast ferry in the water at its June 20, 1998, launch frorn the CFI fast ferry assembly facili- ty on the North Vancouver waterfront. (Inset! Ex-CFi board chairman Jack Munro proudiy displaying a drawing of the troubled ferry. that the poor gualite and productivity ar Vancouver Shipyards was 4 result of poor manage: mene (rot poor workers) and that approaches to Vancouver Shipyards to change their supervisory stat heal nat resulred: in any improvement,” state the Dee. 12, 1996. minutes. “CFI management stated Urat withour changes. there would be signif: icant overruas in fabour hours on that scament of the constraction project.” Rv 1997, the board had more questions and concerns that Crl's management couhl answer, “Management as not complying with the Board's direction,” stated director Kevin Murphy during a Feb, 6, 1997, meeting. At the subsequent March 13, 1997, mecting, Johnstone raised two prophetic points. According vo the minutes, “The Chair complimented man- agement for their commitment to have the ferry delivered by September 1997 bur felt such a com- pletion date was aggressive. She also expressed her concern that the cost/plus funding arrangement could be affecting productivity at Vancouver Shipyards.” During the April 17, 1997, meeting — one that would prove to be the inaugural CFT board's last — Oksana Exell was officially appointed to manage the development of the strategic business plan. A short time later the CFT board’s three inde- pendent members resigned. Their replacements eliminated many of the issues plaguing the first board by ignoring them. For example, the often-discussed strategic plan appeared in the Sept. 16, 1997, meeting minutes as a work in progress, but by Feb. 19, 1998, it had been shelved, “pending a review of responses to the Request for Expressions of Interest for the long-term financing, construction and ownership of replacement vessels.” Exell was out of the province fast week and could not be reached for comment on the state of the CFI strategic business plan to press time Friday. Other members of the two former CFI boards likewise have shunned media attention about their roles in the project’s unravelling, though Michael Goldberg, who sat on the inaugural board with Johnstone, wished the newly appointed and third board well. “Maybe it’s third time lucky,” said the UBC commerce professor. “I wish them more luck than ad. How project players ared SINCE the fast ferry pro- ject first took shape in 1994, a number of its charges have retired, quit or been fired. The follow- ing is a list of the major plavers and how they have fared: ® Frank Rhodes — President and CEO of BC Ferries undi October 1997 when he retired. He was replaced by Tom Ward. Presided over creation of CEL and welcomed its first board of of directors — including the three independent members — inte the fold. @ Andrew Hamilton — The CFI project manager responsible ter the construction af the dirce fast ferries, Resigned in 1997 to purse a posting with an cast coast shipbuiider in Nova Scotia. An interview with Hamilton after his departure revealed: he continues to be a fan of alu- minunr vessels and is pursuing launching such ano industry in Nova Scotia which has consider: ably dower ibour rates, Replaced by John Welly. who had previous experience working with BC Ferries as a consultant. @ Tom Ward — Quit his post x. president and CEQ) of BC Ferries on fan. EF. 1999) atter fess chan wo vears on the job. @ Phil Halkett — Replaced Ward but was fired by new min- ister responsible for fast ferries Gordon Wihon following the release of a thawed) technical report in late 1998, Halkere fast- ed less than three weeks in his position as BC Ferries president and CEO betore being replaced by former BC Transit chief Bob Lingwood. @ Lucille Johnstone — Served as chairman of the first CFI board. Asked questions and requested additional informa. tion throughout her tenure. Resigned in April 1997, less than a year after being appoint: ed. : @ Michael Goldberg ~— Like Johnstone, Goldberg was one of three independent members of the inaugural CFI board of directors, He likewise resigned in April 1997, less than a year after being appointed. @ Kevin Murphy — Another independent appointee who resigned in April 1997, @ Jack Munro — Lifelong friend of organized labour and jongtime NDP insider who took over from Johnstone as chair- man of the CFI board. Quit as part of en masse resignation of both CFI and BC Ferries boards reportedly in response to ultima- tum from minister Gordon Wilson carlier this year. 8 Dan Miller — Relieved of his duties as minister responsible for BC Ferries when Gordon Wilson was named to the post of aborig- inal affairs minister with respon- sibility for the ferry corporation on Jan. 29, 1999, ~— Robert Galster