——MAIL Box——- NV District bylaw bashing questioned Dear Editor: North Vancouver District Councillor Doug Mackay-Dunn’s attack on the News’ editorial and the district’s zoning bylaw demands a response (“Complex Bylaws Are Wasting Tax Dollars” — April 5 letters to the editor). In an obvious attempt to divert attention away from the fact that he supported two massive “variances” for monster houses on the Deep Cove waterfront, rookie Coun. Mackay-Dunn now denounces the “complexity” of the district’s zoning bylaw. The two variances that he supported were each more ‘than 2,000 square feet — larger than many single family homes. One of those variances was the direct result of illegal con- struction. The owner applied for and received a building permit to construct a 2,844-square-foot house, but then went ahead without authorizatioa and built a 5 .116-square-foor house — and additional 2,266 square feet. During council's consideration of this variance, Coun. Mackay-Dunn focused on the maximum building and eave a height. of houses. By questioning district staff, he managed to cated, an admission that the height calculations can be compli- cate - Unfortunately for Mackay-Dunn, variances to height were ~ not an issue. I suspect he was (and is) well aware of this, but : then ... there. is no point in letting inconvenient facts spoil a good argument. To bolster his position that the zoning bylaw is too compli- cated for the poor builders to understand, Coun. Mackay-Dunn .. quoted in his letter’ the assistant manager of planning. These quotes, however, were very selective. have the same council | meeting on tape'and the assistant manager also stated: “Applicants who work with the zoning bylaw know exactly what 1 can and cannot build.” As a police officer, I’m sure that Mackay-Dunn would agree * that parts of che Criminal Code can also be complicated. : When you scratch below the surface, however, you discover these complex rules are there to protect t the public from harm. . Zoning bylaws are no different.° ©. “As for: the. egal construction on Panorama Drive, rather than’ doing the right thing and telling the a applicant to ce to comply with, the zoning bylaw, Councilors Mac Harris, Denault, Dunsford and Mayor Bell, shamefully rewarded him for his efforts. : Brian Platts” North Vancouver . - LYNN'S SPECIALTY An interesti:.g decision was handed down recently by the U.S. Supreme Court with respect to a Hawaiian law which had been in effect since 1978. That law had established, lke the Nisga'a Treaty proposes to do in Canada, a race-based system for controlling the expenditure cf a portion i of the public moneys. THE BACKGROUND The Hawaiian law was challenged by a Caucasian rancher, Harold Rice, who did Not qualify as Hawaiian because ne could not trace at feast half of his bloodline back before 1778, the year of Captain Cook's | arrival. Mr Rice's ancestors had only lived in Hawaii since 1831, but successfully qualifying as Hawaiian would have given him a share of $350 million in trust funds } from the sale or lease of public lands, as well as including him in a !and claims process involving airports and various public enterprises, which Hawaiian Nationalists say were taken from them without their permission. in response to Mr Rice's challenge, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the law which prohibited non-native Hawaiians § from voting in elections to select trustees to manage native Hawaiian affairs, and to spend money which flowed from the public purse. The Court determined that, where the population as a whole has been taxed in order to provide public money, the decision as to how that. money will be spent cannot be turned over exclusively to a group based on their race. Here in Canada, the Nisga'a Treaty i contains provisions similar to those of the Hawaiian law which has just been struck down. The Treaty will exclude non-Nisga’a living on Nisga‘a territory from voting for Nisga'a Government representatives. effectively preventing them from influencing the way in which money given to the Nisga'a by the Crown is spent. This “taxation without representation" is almost certain to lead to yet another legal! challenge to the Nisga'a Treaty. | MORE NISGA'A WOES Back when the Nisga'a Treaty was first introduced in the House of Commons, Reform MPs tried many times, without success, to persuade the Liberal Government. to refer. the Treaty to the Supreme Cour. for an opinion as to whether it wes constitutional, before attempting to pass it. into’ law. We. pointed out that even the provincial wing of the Liberal Party in BC had launched a legal chailenge, and that there were at least ‘three other fegal challenges } underway, including. two from Native bands other than the Nisga’a, We insisted that the’ only way to minimize tia threat of i lagal challenges was to have ihe basic .framawork for the Treaty approved in a province-wide referendum. Every suggestion and every proposed arnendment was rejected though, and the enabling legislation was passed before Christmas of 1999. Ifthe Liberals in Ottawa thought the Bill would..have fast passage through the Senate though, they were wrong. Numerous witnesses have been appearing before the Senate Committee to point out the flaws in the Bill, including, for example, representatives of the Gitanyow Hereditary Chiefs, who are claiming that the Treaty . wrongfully |. inclides lands to which the Gitanyow have laid ctaim. In addition, at least three former ‘Supreme. Court of Canada judges have. now’ taken the position that they believe that the Nisga'a Treaty is unconstitutional, © with one of them, Justice Willard Estey, appearing before the Senate Committee Wednesday, April 12, 2000 —- North Shore News - ~-9 ted white, mp. advertorial, April 12, 2000 cc TREATING EVERYONE EQUALLY on March 23rd. An indication of the gravity of such an appearance could be found in the words of the Chairman of the Committee, Senator Jack Austin, when he commented that he could not recail at any time in the past 25 years that a former judge of the Supreme Court had appeared before a Senate Committee. The transcripts of the Committee hearings record the following statements as having been part of Mr. Estey's presentation: *,. | am not here as a witness primed by some client to say whatever the client wants said. You will hear from me what | believe.” "We have 150 years of experience amongst the three of us, in presenting the law to the courts and In deciding the law in the courts. if we are wrong, God help us, but we think we are right because we have been there before many times." ",. put down your gave! on the legislative process of Bill C-9...just adjourn the matter and, perhaps, consult with the executive branch of government to see if they want to doa reference [to the Supreme Court of Canade]” ... it Is clear that the Agreement provides for the transfer from the governments of Canada and British Columbia to the Nisga'a nation very significant sovereign powers presently possessed by Canada and British Columbia in accordance with the Constitution of Canada. This transfer is by itself unconstitutional ..." "No one is going to thank us for allowing this to go down the ‘road, money spent organizing this, that and the other institution, and the whole thing collapses because of a court order." “.. it is our view that everyone: “ Nisga‘a included, are better served if we do not Introduce something which is... going. to be challenged successfully. “ “(A full copy of the transcript of Mr Estey's evidence can be obtained by calling my office.) AND MORE. On the very morning | was writing this report, the latest in a string of. legal challenges to Nisga’a was announced, this . time by 60 Wilp Chiefs of the Nisga'a themselves, who claim that the. Nisga’a Tribal. Councit tacked the authority to negotiate a Treaty on their behalf." Back when the results of.the Nisga'a referendum were first announced, Reform | MPs want on record with the suggestion | that the media should investigate why: | 40% of the Nisga’e had either not voted, or - actively voted against the Treaty. What a. shame that nobody took the time to carry out that investigation, because if they had done so, these problems within the Nisga'a themselves may have been exposed bafore the Treaty even made itto: the provincial legistature. It now, looks like - we will be getting: the ‘details from very: expensive, taxpayer funded, _ courtroom reports instead. So with the passage of tl very much time at that, taken by the svat tee ar forced the Nisga being undermined. years, perhaps . "decades; of legal. challenges. . Reformers were attacked for ee that this would Hapa f p> When swing was king Enjoy the improvisational, swinging sounds of jazz great, Count Basie, performed by “A® Band and NiteCap on Friday, April 14 at 8p.m. in the Capilano College Performing Arts Theatre. For tickets and information, call 990-7810. Triathlon training Train for the May 22 North Shore spring triathlon with Canadian triathlon champion, Mark Bates. Triathlon for Beginners runs Wednesday evenings and Sunday mornings beginning April 26. The course consists of theory, demonstrations and training sessions and costs $125. For i information and ‘ ’ registration, call ; ’ Continuing Baan at 984-4901. b-Arts and ” entertainment - * management -: Interested in‘a career. working behind the’. scenes inarts °° management? Capilano. _ College's Arts and ©. ~ Enterrainment =... - | ” Management programs are hosting an information session on Wednesday, April 19 at 7:30p.m. in - . the Birch building; room “126. Students are trailed |. in marketing, resource °° development, cotaputer ~ applications, and financial _ and tour management. . Call 984-4911 for details. peCaroer information meetings... ~ Stuck in a rut? Attend one of Capilano College's, ” career information Administration * ~ department is hosting an : vinformation meeting ~ Wednesday, April 19 “7 p.m. it the Cedai building, room 148; Joint. . information meetings will ' be held for the Asia = A ineeting will offered the Legal Assistant ~: program on Thursday, ‘Apel 20 at 6:30p.m-in’ | the Fir etcen “Wednesday, April 26 - 7 p.m. inthe Cedar: . . building; foom 141. For